Toward intelligence or ignorance? Performativity and uncertainty in government tech narratives

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Leif Sundberg , Katarina Gidlund , Aron Larsson , Niclas Olofsson
{"title":"Toward intelligence or ignorance? Performativity and uncertainty in government tech narratives","authors":"Leif Sundberg ,&nbsp;Katarina Gidlund ,&nbsp;Aron Larsson ,&nbsp;Niclas Olofsson","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emerging technologies are often accompanied by optimistic “tech narratives” that emphasize their potential benefits to society. These narratives appear in various sources, including public policy documents, media coverage, and academic literature. However, identifying their origins and underlying rationale can be challenging. This paper addresses the research question (RQ): How can government tech narratives be traced and unveiled? To answer this question, we draw on the theoretical frameworks of “performativity” and “uncertainty assessment” to develop a two-step approach for investigating tech narratives. We apply this methodology to trace a narrative promoting the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Swedish public sector back to its source, an emerging government AI policy program. Our analysis reveals a hybridization of economic and political interests, as well as a recognized ignorance reflected in the lack of scrutiny of highly uncertain calculations. By presenting this two-step methodology for tracing and critically examining tech narratives, this paper makes a methodological contribution. In applying this approach, we also provide empirical insights into how tech narratives facilitate the materialization of technological infrastructures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 2","pages":"Article 102032"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging technologies are often accompanied by optimistic “tech narratives” that emphasize their potential benefits to society. These narratives appear in various sources, including public policy documents, media coverage, and academic literature. However, identifying their origins and underlying rationale can be challenging. This paper addresses the research question (RQ): How can government tech narratives be traced and unveiled? To answer this question, we draw on the theoretical frameworks of “performativity” and “uncertainty assessment” to develop a two-step approach for investigating tech narratives. We apply this methodology to trace a narrative promoting the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Swedish public sector back to its source, an emerging government AI policy program. Our analysis reveals a hybridization of economic and political interests, as well as a recognized ignorance reflected in the lack of scrutiny of highly uncertain calculations. By presenting this two-step methodology for tracing and critically examining tech narratives, this paper makes a methodological contribution. In applying this approach, we also provide empirical insights into how tech narratives facilitate the materialization of technological infrastructures.
走向智慧还是无知?政府科技叙事中的表演性和不确定性
新兴技术往往伴随着乐观的“技术叙事”,强调它们对社会的潜在好处。这些叙述出现在各种来源,包括公共政策文件、媒体报道和学术文献。然而,确定它们的起源和基本原理可能具有挑战性。本文解决了研究问题(RQ):如何追踪和揭示政府的技术叙事?为了回答这个问题,我们借鉴了“表演性”和“不确定性评估”的理论框架,开发了一种两步法来调查技术叙事。我们运用这种方法来追溯瑞典公共部门推广人工智能(AI)好处的叙述,这是一个新兴的政府人工智能政策计划。我们的分析揭示了经济和政治利益的混合,以及对高度不确定的计算缺乏审查所反映的公认的无知。通过提出这种追踪和批判性检查技术叙述的两步方法,本文在方法论上做出了贡献。在应用这种方法时,我们还提供了关于技术叙事如何促进技术基础设施物质化的实证见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信