Effects of focusing geometries and detection methods on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of an aluminum target

IF 2.2 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 OPTICS
Yifan Luo , Nan Li , Jiaxu Zhang , Yangyang Zhao , Jiaojian Song , Yongqiu Zheng
{"title":"Effects of focusing geometries and detection methods on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of an aluminum target","authors":"Yifan Luo ,&nbsp;Nan Li ,&nbsp;Jiaxu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yangyang Zhao ,&nbsp;Jiaojian Song ,&nbsp;Yongqiu Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effective breakdown and signal detection are the basis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) optical systems for elemental analysis. High-quality spectra can provide reliable data support for LIBS technology. In this work, the effects of focusing geometries and detection methods were investigated on LIBS analysis of an aluminum target at laser energies of 2, 10 and 20 mJ. Two focusing geometries were selected for comparison, namely focusing with a beam expander and focusing directly. The plasma signals were collected backward through a dichroic mirror. Two detection methods were employed, one to detect the plasma emission through transmission fibers at different angles and the other to couple the plasma emission directly into the entrance slit of the spectrometer. It is shown that focusing with a beam expander could increase the focusing angle and decrease the laser power density, leading to poor focusing quality, relatively weak signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Focusing without a beam expander makes the ablation crater smaller and deeper, and leads to the enhancement of line intensity and SNR compared to focusing with a beam expander. In addition, detection by the entrance slit of the spectrometer directly can reflect the difference between the focusing geometries truthfully. The optical fiber endface offers a wide range of reception angles, enabling it to absorb more plasma emissions and reduce signal loss. Larger detection angles are typically preferred when detecting via optical fiber to achieve superior LIBS signals, which has been verified by plasma images. The present results suggest that focusing without a beam expander and detection by an optical fiber with a large angle make it easier to obtain high quality plasma signals when performing LIBS measurements on solid samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19586,"journal":{"name":"Optics Communications","volume":"587 ","pages":"Article 131951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401825004791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effective breakdown and signal detection are the basis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) optical systems for elemental analysis. High-quality spectra can provide reliable data support for LIBS technology. In this work, the effects of focusing geometries and detection methods were investigated on LIBS analysis of an aluminum target at laser energies of 2, 10 and 20 mJ. Two focusing geometries were selected for comparison, namely focusing with a beam expander and focusing directly. The plasma signals were collected backward through a dichroic mirror. Two detection methods were employed, one to detect the plasma emission through transmission fibers at different angles and the other to couple the plasma emission directly into the entrance slit of the spectrometer. It is shown that focusing with a beam expander could increase the focusing angle and decrease the laser power density, leading to poor focusing quality, relatively weak signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Focusing without a beam expander makes the ablation crater smaller and deeper, and leads to the enhancement of line intensity and SNR compared to focusing with a beam expander. In addition, detection by the entrance slit of the spectrometer directly can reflect the difference between the focusing geometries truthfully. The optical fiber endface offers a wide range of reception angles, enabling it to absorb more plasma emissions and reduce signal loss. Larger detection angles are typically preferred when detecting via optical fiber to achieve superior LIBS signals, which has been verified by plasma images. The present results suggest that focusing without a beam expander and detection by an optical fiber with a large angle make it easier to obtain high quality plasma signals when performing LIBS measurements on solid samples.
聚焦几何形状和检测方法对铝靶激光诱导击穿光谱的影响
有效击穿和信号检测是元素分析激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)光学系统的基础。高质量的光谱可以为LIBS技术提供可靠的数据支持。本文研究了聚焦几何形状和检测方法对激光能量为2、10和20 mJ的铝靶的LIBS分析的影响。选择两种聚焦几何形状进行比较,即用扩束器聚焦和直接聚焦。等离子体信号通过二向色镜反向收集。采用两种检测方法,一种是通过不同角度的传输光纤检测等离子体发射,另一种是将等离子体发射直接耦合到光谱仪的入口狭缝中。结果表明,用扩束器进行聚焦会增大聚焦角度,降低激光功率密度,导致聚焦质量差,信号强度和信噪比相对较弱。不加扩束器的聚焦使得烧蚀坑更小、更深,并且与加扩束器聚焦相比,线强和信噪比都有所提高。此外,直接通过光谱仪的入口狭缝进行检测,可以真实地反映出聚焦几何形状的差异。光纤端面提供了广泛的接收角度,使其能够吸收更多的等离子体发射并减少信号损失。当通过光纤检测时,为了获得更好的LIBS信号,通常更大的探测角度是首选,这已经被等离子体图像验证。结果表明,在对固体样品进行LIBS测量时,不使用扩束器聚焦和使用大角度光纤检测更容易获得高质量的等离子体信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optics Communications
Optics Communications 物理-光学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
681
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Optics Communications invites original and timely contributions containing new results in various fields of optics and photonics. The journal considers theoretical and experimental research in areas ranging from the fundamental properties of light to technological applications. Topics covered include classical and quantum optics, optical physics and light-matter interactions, lasers, imaging, guided-wave optics and optical information processing. Manuscripts should offer clear evidence of novelty and significance. Papers concentrating on mathematical and computational issues, with limited connection to optics, are not suitable for publication in the Journal. Similarly, small technical advances, or papers concerned only with engineering applications or issues of materials science fall outside the journal scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信