Effectiveness of Chlorine Against Tulane Virus, A Human Norovirus Surrogate, and Escherichia coli in Preharvest Agricultural Water

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ashlyn Lake , Nuradeen Garba Yusuf , Mya Maybank , Sarah Johnson , Christopher K. Mutch , Alexander P. Mueck , Simon S. Riley , Arie H. Havelaar , Naim Montazeri
{"title":"Effectiveness of Chlorine Against Tulane Virus, A Human Norovirus Surrogate, and Escherichia coli in Preharvest Agricultural Water","authors":"Ashlyn Lake ,&nbsp;Nuradeen Garba Yusuf ,&nbsp;Mya Maybank ,&nbsp;Sarah Johnson ,&nbsp;Christopher K. Mutch ,&nbsp;Alexander P. Mueck ,&nbsp;Simon S. Riley ,&nbsp;Arie H. Havelaar ,&nbsp;Naim Montazeri","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of fecally polluted water increases the risk of crop contamination with human norovirus (HuNoV) and its transmission to humans, particularly through ready-to-eat foods such as fresh produce. Preventing such exposure at preharvest stages is critical to ensure food safety throughout the supply chain. Despite HuNoV being the leading cause of foodborne illnesses in the United States, effective mitigating strategies in preharvest agricultural water remain underdeveloped. This research evaluated the effectiveness of calcium hypochlorite, a commercially available sanitizer to inactivate the Tulane virus, a surrogate for HuNoV, and <em>Escherichia coli</em> TVS 353 in preharvest agricultural waters. Water samples from two Florida farms were collected and inoculated with each microbial type, then treated with different free chlorine dosages (2, 4, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 ppm) for 5 and 10 min. The treatments were conducted at 12 °C to reflect colder months in Florida, aligning with the temperature specification outlined in the EPA/FDA protocol. Microbial counts were performed using plaque assay for Tulane virus and plate counts for <em>E. coli</em>. Since increasing the contact time from 5 to 10 min did not significantly enhance microbial inactivation rates (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05), kinetic models were fit to inactivation data for the 5-min contact time. The log<sub>10</sub>-logistic model predicted that achieving the EPA/FDA 3-log<sub>10</sub> microbial reduction criteria in the agricultural water samples required treatment with free chlorine ranging between 0.6 and 0.9 ppm for <em>E. coli</em> and 9.6–23 ppm for Tulane virus. Compared to <em>E. coli</em>, Tulane virus was more resistant to inactivation with higher variability in reduction rates between the two agricultural water samples (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The necessity for elevated doses needed to inactivate viruses demands additional investigation, emphasizing the importance of implementing risk-based, environmentally safe treatments for agricultural water.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 6","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of fecally polluted water increases the risk of crop contamination with human norovirus (HuNoV) and its transmission to humans, particularly through ready-to-eat foods such as fresh produce. Preventing such exposure at preharvest stages is critical to ensure food safety throughout the supply chain. Despite HuNoV being the leading cause of foodborne illnesses in the United States, effective mitigating strategies in preharvest agricultural water remain underdeveloped. This research evaluated the effectiveness of calcium hypochlorite, a commercially available sanitizer to inactivate the Tulane virus, a surrogate for HuNoV, and Escherichia coli TVS 353 in preharvest agricultural waters. Water samples from two Florida farms were collected and inoculated with each microbial type, then treated with different free chlorine dosages (2, 4, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 ppm) for 5 and 10 min. The treatments were conducted at 12 °C to reflect colder months in Florida, aligning with the temperature specification outlined in the EPA/FDA protocol. Microbial counts were performed using plaque assay for Tulane virus and plate counts for E. coli. Since increasing the contact time from 5 to 10 min did not significantly enhance microbial inactivation rates (p > 0.05), kinetic models were fit to inactivation data for the 5-min contact time. The log10-logistic model predicted that achieving the EPA/FDA 3-log10 microbial reduction criteria in the agricultural water samples required treatment with free chlorine ranging between 0.6 and 0.9 ppm for E. coli and 9.6–23 ppm for Tulane virus. Compared to E. coli, Tulane virus was more resistant to inactivation with higher variability in reduction rates between the two agricultural water samples (p < 0.001). The necessity for elevated doses needed to inactivate viruses demands additional investigation, emphasizing the importance of implementing risk-based, environmentally safe treatments for agricultural water.
氯对收获前农业用水中杜兰病毒、诺如病毒替代物和大肠杆菌的抑制效果
使用粪便污染的水增加了人类诺如病毒污染作物及其传播给人类的风险,特别是通过新鲜农产品等即食食品传播的风险。在收获前阶段防止这种接触对于确保整个供应链的食品安全至关重要。尽管HuNoV是美国食源性疾病的主要原因,但收获前农业用水的有效缓解策略仍然不发达。本研究评估了次氯酸钙的有效性,次氯酸钙是一种市售的消毒液,可灭活杜兰病毒(HuNoV的替代品)和大肠杆菌TVS 353在收获前农业水域中的作用。从佛罗里达州的两个农场收集水样,接种每种微生物类型,然后用不同的游离氯剂量(2、4、10、15、20、30和40 ppm)处理5分钟和10分钟。处理在12°C进行,以反映佛罗里达州较冷的月份,与EPA/FDA协议中概述的温度规范保持一致。微生物计数采用斑块法检测杜兰病毒,平板法检测大肠杆菌。由于将接触时间从5分钟增加到10分钟并没有显著提高微生物灭活率(p >;0.05),动力学模型拟合5min接触时间的失活数据。log10-logistic模型预测,在农业水样中达到EPA/FDA的3-log10微生物减少标准需要用游离氯处理,游离氯处理大肠杆菌为0.6 - 0.9 ppm,游离氯处理杜兰病毒为9.6-23 ppm。与大肠杆菌相比,杜兰病毒对灭活的抵抗力更强,两种农业水样之间的还原率差异更大(p <;0.001)。提高灭活病毒所需剂量的必要性需要进一步调查,强调对农业用水实施基于风险的环境安全处理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信