Selective emotion regulation in creative art production: Psychophysiological reactivity during painting reduces anxiety

IF 4.6 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Lucas Bellaiche , Kayla Lihardo , Chloe Williams , Jill Chaffee , Kevin S. LaBar , Paul Seli
{"title":"Selective emotion regulation in creative art production: Psychophysiological reactivity during painting reduces anxiety","authors":"Lucas Bellaiche ,&nbsp;Kayla Lihardo ,&nbsp;Chloe Williams ,&nbsp;Jill Chaffee ,&nbsp;Kevin S. LaBar ,&nbsp;Paul Seli","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2025.112543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Across the literatures of aesthetics, philosophy, and psychology, art has long been revered as a powerful means to enhance mental well-being—a perspective that has been integrated into clinical practices worldwide. While some empirical research supports the emotional benefits of art production, such work often captures non-creativity factors (e.g., physical movement and social interaction), leaving the contribution of creative expression on psychophysiological outcomes unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a pre-registered, multi-modal, repeated-measures study wherein participants completed both a painting task and a non-creative but active control task. Our findings demonstrate that, above and beyond the non-creativity processes shared with the control task, painting selectively reduces anxiety, and that greater cognitive engagement and physiological reactivity characterize this reduction. These findings highlight the multi-modal determinants of emotional improvement during artistic production, providing empirical support for the therapeutic benefits of art-making specific to the regulation of anxiety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":342,"journal":{"name":"iScience","volume":"28 6","pages":"Article 112543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iScience","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225008041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across the literatures of aesthetics, philosophy, and psychology, art has long been revered as a powerful means to enhance mental well-being—a perspective that has been integrated into clinical practices worldwide. While some empirical research supports the emotional benefits of art production, such work often captures non-creativity factors (e.g., physical movement and social interaction), leaving the contribution of creative expression on psychophysiological outcomes unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a pre-registered, multi-modal, repeated-measures study wherein participants completed both a painting task and a non-creative but active control task. Our findings demonstrate that, above and beyond the non-creativity processes shared with the control task, painting selectively reduces anxiety, and that greater cognitive engagement and physiological reactivity characterize this reduction. These findings highlight the multi-modal determinants of emotional improvement during artistic production, providing empirical support for the therapeutic benefits of art-making specific to the regulation of anxiety.

Abstract Image

创造性艺术生产中的选择性情绪调节:绘画中的心理生理反应减少焦虑
在美学、哲学和心理学的文献中,艺术一直被视为增强心理健康的有力手段——这一观点已被纳入全球的临床实践。虽然一些实证研究支持艺术生产的情感益处,但此类工作通常捕获非创造性因素(例如,身体运动和社会互动),使创造性表达对心理生理结果的贡献不明确。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项预先注册的、多模式的、重复测量的研究,其中参与者完成了绘画任务和非创造性但积极的控制任务。我们的研究结果表明,除了与控制任务共享的非创造性过程之外,绘画选择性地减少了焦虑,并且更大的认知参与和生理反应是这种减少的特征。这些发现强调了艺术创作过程中情绪改善的多模态决定因素,为艺术创作对焦虑调节的治疗益处提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
iScience
iScience Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1972
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Science has many big remaining questions. To address them, we will need to work collaboratively and across disciplines. The goal of iScience is to help fuel that type of interdisciplinary thinking. iScience is a new open-access journal from Cell Press that provides a platform for original research in the life, physical, and earth sciences. The primary criterion for publication in iScience is a significant contribution to a relevant field combined with robust results and underlying methodology. The advances appearing in iScience include both fundamental and applied investigations across this interdisciplinary range of topic areas. To support transparency in scientific investigation, we are happy to consider replication studies and papers that describe negative results. We know you want your work to be published quickly and to be widely visible within your community and beyond. With the strong international reputation of Cell Press behind it, publication in iScience will help your work garner the attention and recognition it merits. Like all Cell Press journals, iScience prioritizes rapid publication. Our editorial team pays special attention to high-quality author service and to efficient, clear-cut decisions based on the information available within the manuscript. iScience taps into the expertise across Cell Press journals and selected partners to inform our editorial decisions and help publish your science in a timely and seamless way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信