Lymphocyte dynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with dimethyl fumarate and subsequently switched to diroximel fumarate

Shauna M. Gales , Ahmed Z. Obeidat , Andreina Neall , Kermit A. Lloyd , Nicholas Belviso , Seth Levin , Ivan Bozin , Jason P. Mendoza , James B. Lewin , Michael D. Kornberg
{"title":"Lymphocyte dynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with dimethyl fumarate and subsequently switched to diroximel fumarate","authors":"Shauna M. Gales ,&nbsp;Ahmed Z. Obeidat ,&nbsp;Andreina Neall ,&nbsp;Kermit A. Lloyd ,&nbsp;Nicholas Belviso ,&nbsp;Seth Levin ,&nbsp;Ivan Bozin ,&nbsp;Jason P. Mendoza ,&nbsp;James B. Lewin ,&nbsp;Michael D. Kornberg","doi":"10.1016/j.dscb.2025.100229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and diroximel fumarate (DRF) are oral multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) dynamics are similar for DMF and DRF, but have not been investigated in patients who switched from DMF to DRF. This retrospective, observational study of the US Komodo Health Claims Database characterized ALC dynamics and outcomes in patients who switched DMF-DRF (“Switchers”) versus patients who stayed on DMF (“Stayers”).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eligible patients aged 18–64 years, with a diagnosis of MS and ≥1 DMT claim during the study period (01Jan2015<img>31Aug2022) had ≥1 year on DMF before switching to DRF and ≥6 months on DRF. Switchers were propensity score-matched 1:2 to Stayers. Assessments included ALC, relapses, and infection-related healthcare encounters (HCEs) and healthcare costs (HCCs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 94 eligible Switchers, 62 were matched with 124 Stayers. Mean (SD) duration of DMF exposure was 36.0 (16.0) months prior to index date/switch and 15.0 (4.9) months post-index date/switch. Over 12 months, mean ALC change from index date was –26.9 % (Switchers) versus +3.5 % (Stayers). In Switchers, mean ALC remained stable thereafter. Proportions remaining relapse-free during 15 months mean follow-up were similar between Switchers (95 %) and Stayers (91 %). Outcomes were similar for annualized rates of infection-related HCEs (mean [SD]: Switchers, 0.70 [1.03]; Stayers, 0.74 [1.57]) and HCCs (mean [SD]: Switchers, $285 [$856]; Stayers, $346 [$2299]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over 12 months, ALC declined by 26.9 % in Switchers but increased by 3.5 % in Stayers. Despite this difference in ALC dynamics, infection-related HCEs and HCCs remained low and comparable between cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72447,"journal":{"name":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666459325000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and diroximel fumarate (DRF) are oral multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) dynamics are similar for DMF and DRF, but have not been investigated in patients who switched from DMF to DRF. This retrospective, observational study of the US Komodo Health Claims Database characterized ALC dynamics and outcomes in patients who switched DMF-DRF (“Switchers”) versus patients who stayed on DMF (“Stayers”).

Methods

Eligible patients aged 18–64 years, with a diagnosis of MS and ≥1 DMT claim during the study period (01Jan201531Aug2022) had ≥1 year on DMF before switching to DRF and ≥6 months on DRF. Switchers were propensity score-matched 1:2 to Stayers. Assessments included ALC, relapses, and infection-related healthcare encounters (HCEs) and healthcare costs (HCCs).

Results

Of 94 eligible Switchers, 62 were matched with 124 Stayers. Mean (SD) duration of DMF exposure was 36.0 (16.0) months prior to index date/switch and 15.0 (4.9) months post-index date/switch. Over 12 months, mean ALC change from index date was –26.9 % (Switchers) versus +3.5 % (Stayers). In Switchers, mean ALC remained stable thereafter. Proportions remaining relapse-free during 15 months mean follow-up were similar between Switchers (95 %) and Stayers (91 %). Outcomes were similar for annualized rates of infection-related HCEs (mean [SD]: Switchers, 0.70 [1.03]; Stayers, 0.74 [1.57]) and HCCs (mean [SD]: Switchers, $285 [$856]; Stayers, $346 [$2299]).

Conclusion

Over 12 months, ALC declined by 26.9 % in Switchers but increased by 3.5 % in Stayers. Despite this difference in ALC dynamics, infection-related HCEs and HCCs remained low and comparable between cohorts.
用富马酸二甲酯治疗的多发性硬化症患者的淋巴细胞动力学,随后改用富马酸双洛西梅尔
目的富马酸二甲酯(DMF)和富马酸双洛西梅尔(DRF)是口服多发性硬化症(MS)的减病治疗药物。绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)动态在DMF和DRF中相似,但在从DMF切换到DRF的患者中尚未研究。这项对美国Komodo健康声明数据库的回顾性观察性研究,描述了切换DMF- drf(“切换者”)与继续使用DMF(“留用者”)患者的ALC动态和结果。方法符合条件的患者年龄为18-64岁,在研究期间(2015年1月1日至2022年8月1日)诊断为MS且DMT索赔≥1例,在转为DRF之前,DMF治疗≥1年,DRF治疗≥6个月。转换者的倾向得分与停留者的倾向得分匹配为1:2。评估包括ALC、复发、感染相关医疗遭遇(HCEs)和医疗成本(HCCs)。结果94名符合条件的转换者中,62名与124名留用者匹配。DMF暴露的平均(SD)持续时间在指数日期/转换之前为36.0(16.0)个月,在指数日期/转换之后为15.0(4.9)个月。在12个月内,从指数日期开始的平均ALC变化为- 26.9%(转换者),而+ 3.5%(停留者)。在切换者中,平均ALC此后保持稳定。在15个月的平均随访中,转换组(95%)和留用组(91%)无复发的比例相似。感染相关hce的年化率结果相似(平均[SD]:切换者,0.70 [1.03];停留者,0.74[1.57])和hcc(平均[SD]:转换者,285[856]美元;Stayers, 346美元[2299美元])。结论在12个月内,转换组ALC下降26.9%,而留用组ALC上升3.5%。尽管ALC动态存在差异,但与感染相关的hce和hcc在队列之间仍然很低且具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信