Immersive technologies in Education: Exploring user experience and engagement in building energy simulations through AR and VR

Kifah Alhazzaa , Wei Yan
{"title":"Immersive technologies in Education: Exploring user experience and engagement in building energy simulations through AR and VR","authors":"Kifah Alhazzaa ,&nbsp;Wei Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the unique user experiences created by Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies within the realm of building energy simulations. By developing two distinct prototypes, BIMThermoVR and BIMThermoAR, this research investigates the cognitive demands and educational benefits of immersive visualization tools. The research investigates how these immersive tools affect student engagement, perception, and learning outcomes. A user study was conducted with first- and second-year Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) students, as well as undergraduate students from non-AEC disciplines at Texas A&amp;M University. Participants were divided into VR and AR groups to compare the effectiveness of each platform. To evaluate learning perception and motivation, the study employed the Perception Questionnaire (PQ) and the Reduced Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (RIMMS). Statistical analyses, including independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, revealed significant differences between AR and VR in environmental perception and cognitive load (p &lt; 0.05). The prototypes allowed students to visualize building energy simulations and behaviors, with their experiences evaluated using the PQ and tRIMMS. Statistical tests, including independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, identified significant differences in environmental perceptions, with AR being favored for its contextual relevance and reduced cognitive load. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) further demonstrated that AR provided a more intuitive and contextually relevant learning experience, reducing cognitive strain compared to VR. The results highlight that while both AR and VR enhance educational engagement, AR's seamless integration of digital content with the real-world environment makes it more effective for instructional communication and visualization. This research contributes to the expanding field of educational technology by emphasizing the importance of customized AR and VR solutions to optimize learning outcomes across varied educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100320,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education: X Reality","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education: X Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678025000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the unique user experiences created by Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies within the realm of building energy simulations. By developing two distinct prototypes, BIMThermoVR and BIMThermoAR, this research investigates the cognitive demands and educational benefits of immersive visualization tools. The research investigates how these immersive tools affect student engagement, perception, and learning outcomes. A user study was conducted with first- and second-year Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) students, as well as undergraduate students from non-AEC disciplines at Texas A&M University. Participants were divided into VR and AR groups to compare the effectiveness of each platform. To evaluate learning perception and motivation, the study employed the Perception Questionnaire (PQ) and the Reduced Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (RIMMS). Statistical analyses, including independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, revealed significant differences between AR and VR in environmental perception and cognitive load (p < 0.05). The prototypes allowed students to visualize building energy simulations and behaviors, with their experiences evaluated using the PQ and tRIMMS. Statistical tests, including independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, identified significant differences in environmental perceptions, with AR being favored for its contextual relevance and reduced cognitive load. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) further demonstrated that AR provided a more intuitive and contextually relevant learning experience, reducing cognitive strain compared to VR. The results highlight that while both AR and VR enhance educational engagement, AR's seamless integration of digital content with the real-world environment makes it more effective for instructional communication and visualization. This research contributes to the expanding field of educational technology by emphasizing the importance of customized AR and VR solutions to optimize learning outcomes across varied educational settings.
教育中的沉浸式技术:通过AR和VR探索建筑能源模拟的用户体验和参与
本研究探讨了虚拟现实(VR)和增强现实(AR)技术在建筑能源模拟领域创造的独特用户体验。通过开发两个不同的原型,BIMThermoVR和BIMThermoAR,本研究调查了沉浸式可视化工具的认知需求和教育效益。该研究调查了这些沉浸式工具如何影响学生的参与、感知和学习成果。一项用户研究是在德克萨斯农工大学建筑、工程和建筑(AEC)专业一年级和二年级的学生以及来自非AEC专业的本科生中进行的。参与者被分为VR组和AR组,以比较每个平台的有效性。本研究采用认知问卷(PQ)和精简教材动机调查(RIMMS)来评估学习知觉和动机。包括独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验在内的统计分析显示,AR和VR在环境感知和认知负荷方面存在显著差异(p <;0.05)。这些原型允许学生可视化建筑能源模拟和行为,并使用PQ和tRIMMS评估他们的经验。统计测试,包括独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,确定了环境感知的显着差异,AR因其上下文相关性和减少认知负荷而受到青睐。效应量(Cohen’s d)进一步证明,与VR相比,AR提供了更直观和情境相关的学习体验,减少了认知压力。研究结果强调,虽然AR和VR都增强了教育参与度,但AR将数字内容与现实世界环境无缝集成,使其在教学交流和可视化方面更加有效。本研究通过强调定制的AR和VR解决方案在不同教育环境中优化学习成果的重要性,有助于扩大教育技术领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信