Exploration of rapid testing methods for unsaturated soils

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xu Li , Yu-Xin Zhao , A-Qiang Liu
{"title":"Exploration of rapid testing methods for unsaturated soils","authors":"Xu Li ,&nbsp;Yu-Xin Zhao ,&nbsp;A-Qiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The laboratory experiment is an effective tool for the rapid assessment of the unsaturated soil slopes instability induced by extreme weather events. However, traditional experimental methods for unsaturated soils, including the measurement of the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), soil hydraulic conductivity function (SHCF), shear strength envelope, etc., are time-consuming. To overcome this limitation, a rapid testing strategy is proposed. In the experimental design, the water saturation level is selected as the control variable instead of the suction level. In the suction measurement, the suction monitoring method is adopted instead of the suction control method, allowing for simultaneous testing of multiple soil samples. The proposed rapid testing strategy is applied to measure the soil hydro-mechanical properties over a wide suction/saturation range. The results demonstrate that: (1) only 3–4 samples and 2–5 days are in need in the measurement of SWCC; (2) 7 days is enough to determine a complete permeability function; (3) only 3 samples and 3–7 days are in need in the measurement of the shear strength envelope; (4) pore size/water distribution measurement technique is fast and recommended as a beneficial supplement to traditional test methods for unsaturated soils.</div><div>Our findings suggest that by employing these proposed rapid testing methods, the measurement of pivotal properties for unsaturated soils can be accomplished within one week, thus significantly reducing the temporal and financial costs associated with experiments. The findings provide a reliable experimental approach for the rapid risk assessment of geological disasters induced by extreme climatic events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 108106"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225002029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The laboratory experiment is an effective tool for the rapid assessment of the unsaturated soil slopes instability induced by extreme weather events. However, traditional experimental methods for unsaturated soils, including the measurement of the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), soil hydraulic conductivity function (SHCF), shear strength envelope, etc., are time-consuming. To overcome this limitation, a rapid testing strategy is proposed. In the experimental design, the water saturation level is selected as the control variable instead of the suction level. In the suction measurement, the suction monitoring method is adopted instead of the suction control method, allowing for simultaneous testing of multiple soil samples. The proposed rapid testing strategy is applied to measure the soil hydro-mechanical properties over a wide suction/saturation range. The results demonstrate that: (1) only 3–4 samples and 2–5 days are in need in the measurement of SWCC; (2) 7 days is enough to determine a complete permeability function; (3) only 3 samples and 3–7 days are in need in the measurement of the shear strength envelope; (4) pore size/water distribution measurement technique is fast and recommended as a beneficial supplement to traditional test methods for unsaturated soils.
Our findings suggest that by employing these proposed rapid testing methods, the measurement of pivotal properties for unsaturated soils can be accomplished within one week, thus significantly reducing the temporal and financial costs associated with experiments. The findings provide a reliable experimental approach for the rapid risk assessment of geological disasters induced by extreme climatic events.
非饱和土快速试验方法的探索
室内试验是快速评价极端天气引起非饱和土边坡失稳的有效工具。然而,传统的非饱和土试验方法,包括土-水特征曲线(SWCC)、土水导函数(SHCF)、抗剪强度包络线等测量,耗时较长。为了克服这一限制,提出了一种快速测试策略。在实验设计中,我们选择水饱和度作为控制变量,而不是吸力水平。在吸力测量中,采用吸力监测法代替吸力控制法,可以同时测试多个土样。将提出的快速测试策略应用于在大吸力/饱和范围内测量土壤的水力学特性。结果表明:(1)SWCC测量只需要3-4个样品和2-5天;(2) 7天足够确定一个完整的渗透率函数;(3)抗剪强度包络线测量只需要3个试样和3 ~ 7天;(4)非饱和土孔隙尺寸/水分分布测量技术快速,是传统非饱和土测试方法的有益补充。我们的研究结果表明,通过采用这些提出的快速测试方法,非饱和土的关键特性的测量可以在一周内完成,从而大大减少了与实验相关的时间和财务成本。研究结果为极端气候事件诱发地质灾害的快速风险评估提供了可靠的实验方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信