Dorothee Göttert, Johanna Geesey, Jana Scheynen, Jan Dries
{"title":"Advancing biological phosphorus removal from carbon-limited potato processing wastewater: enhancing EBPR through organic load optimization","authors":"Dorothee Göttert, Johanna Geesey, Jana Scheynen, Jan Dries","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) offers a sustainable alternative to chemical methods for industrial wastewater treatment, addressing a demand in the Belgian potato processing industry. This study develops a fully biological Sequencing Batch Reactor cycle for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal from the carbon-limited anaerobic digestate (“effluent”), utilizing pre-anaerobic digestate (“influent”) as an internal carbon source. The research was conducted in three testing packages: (I) preliminary batch testing to assess the influent feedwater's suitability as a carbon source, (II) cycle configuration and feeding strategy testing, and (III) carbon dose limiting testing to determine organic loading thresholds. After determining that a split effluent and influent feedwater feeding is necessary to give EBPR the carbon advantage, COD, TN, and TP removal efficiencies of 98.1 %, 98.9 %, and 93 % respectively were achieved. While evaluating organic load dosing through effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios ranging from 2:1 to 4:1, a marked decline in phosphate release and uptake activity was observed after a ratio of 3:1, despite all phases remaining within the TN and TP discharge limits of 15 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Given the inherent fluctuations in wastewater composition throughout the production day, effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios offer a more reliable and adaptive control strategy than COD:N and COD:P ratios. Molecular analysis revealed key microbial communities driving EBPR, including <em>Ca_</em>Accumulibacter, <em>Dechloromonas</em>, and <em>Tetrasphaera</em>. With a focus on practical application and scalability, this study highlights the importance of maintaining suitable carbon-to-nutrient ratios for stable biological nutrient removal performance in complex industrial wastewater treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 107890"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425009626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) offers a sustainable alternative to chemical methods for industrial wastewater treatment, addressing a demand in the Belgian potato processing industry. This study develops a fully biological Sequencing Batch Reactor cycle for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal from the carbon-limited anaerobic digestate (“effluent”), utilizing pre-anaerobic digestate (“influent”) as an internal carbon source. The research was conducted in three testing packages: (I) preliminary batch testing to assess the influent feedwater's suitability as a carbon source, (II) cycle configuration and feeding strategy testing, and (III) carbon dose limiting testing to determine organic loading thresholds. After determining that a split effluent and influent feedwater feeding is necessary to give EBPR the carbon advantage, COD, TN, and TP removal efficiencies of 98.1 %, 98.9 %, and 93 % respectively were achieved. While evaluating organic load dosing through effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios ranging from 2:1 to 4:1, a marked decline in phosphate release and uptake activity was observed after a ratio of 3:1, despite all phases remaining within the TN and TP discharge limits of 15 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Given the inherent fluctuations in wastewater composition throughout the production day, effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios offer a more reliable and adaptive control strategy than COD:N and COD:P ratios. Molecular analysis revealed key microbial communities driving EBPR, including Ca_Accumulibacter, Dechloromonas, and Tetrasphaera. With a focus on practical application and scalability, this study highlights the importance of maintaining suitable carbon-to-nutrient ratios for stable biological nutrient removal performance in complex industrial wastewater treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies