Advancing biological phosphorus removal from carbon-limited potato processing wastewater: enhancing EBPR through organic load optimization

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Dorothee Göttert, Johanna Geesey, Jana Scheynen, Jan Dries
{"title":"Advancing biological phosphorus removal from carbon-limited potato processing wastewater: enhancing EBPR through organic load optimization","authors":"Dorothee Göttert,&nbsp;Johanna Geesey,&nbsp;Jana Scheynen,&nbsp;Jan Dries","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) offers a sustainable alternative to chemical methods for industrial wastewater treatment, addressing a demand in the Belgian potato processing industry. This study develops a fully biological Sequencing Batch Reactor cycle for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal from the carbon-limited anaerobic digestate (“effluent”), utilizing pre-anaerobic digestate (“influent”) as an internal carbon source. The research was conducted in three testing packages: (I) preliminary batch testing to assess the influent feedwater's suitability as a carbon source, (II) cycle configuration and feeding strategy testing, and (III) carbon dose limiting testing to determine organic loading thresholds. After determining that a split effluent and influent feedwater feeding is necessary to give EBPR the carbon advantage, COD, TN, and TP removal efficiencies of 98.1 %, 98.9 %, and 93 % respectively were achieved. While evaluating organic load dosing through effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios ranging from 2:1 to 4:1, a marked decline in phosphate release and uptake activity was observed after a ratio of 3:1, despite all phases remaining within the TN and TP discharge limits of 15 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Given the inherent fluctuations in wastewater composition throughout the production day, effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios offer a more reliable and adaptive control strategy than COD:N and COD:P ratios. Molecular analysis revealed key microbial communities driving EBPR, including <em>Ca_</em>Accumulibacter, <em>Dechloromonas</em>, and <em>Tetrasphaera</em>. With a focus on practical application and scalability, this study highlights the importance of maintaining suitable carbon-to-nutrient ratios for stable biological nutrient removal performance in complex industrial wastewater treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 107890"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425009626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) offers a sustainable alternative to chemical methods for industrial wastewater treatment, addressing a demand in the Belgian potato processing industry. This study develops a fully biological Sequencing Batch Reactor cycle for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal from the carbon-limited anaerobic digestate (“effluent”), utilizing pre-anaerobic digestate (“influent”) as an internal carbon source. The research was conducted in three testing packages: (I) preliminary batch testing to assess the influent feedwater's suitability as a carbon source, (II) cycle configuration and feeding strategy testing, and (III) carbon dose limiting testing to determine organic loading thresholds. After determining that a split effluent and influent feedwater feeding is necessary to give EBPR the carbon advantage, COD, TN, and TP removal efficiencies of 98.1 %, 98.9 %, and 93 % respectively were achieved. While evaluating organic load dosing through effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios ranging from 2:1 to 4:1, a marked decline in phosphate release and uptake activity was observed after a ratio of 3:1, despite all phases remaining within the TN and TP discharge limits of 15 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Given the inherent fluctuations in wastewater composition throughout the production day, effluent-to-influent feedwater ratios offer a more reliable and adaptive control strategy than COD:N and COD:P ratios. Molecular analysis revealed key microbial communities driving EBPR, including Ca_Accumulibacter, Dechloromonas, and Tetrasphaera. With a focus on practical application and scalability, this study highlights the importance of maintaining suitable carbon-to-nutrient ratios for stable biological nutrient removal performance in complex industrial wastewater treatment.
推进碳限马铃薯加工废水的生物除磷:通过有机负荷优化提高EBPR
增强型生物除磷(EBPR)为工业废水处理提供了一种可持续的替代化学方法,解决了比利时马铃薯加工业的需求。本研究开发了一个全生物测序间歇式反应器循环,利用预厌氧消化液(进水)作为内部碳源,同时从碳限制的厌氧消化液(“流出”)中去除氮和磷。该研究通过三个测试包进行:(I)初步批量测试,以评估进水给水作为碳源的适用性;(II)循环配置和投料策略测试;(III)碳剂量限制测试,以确定有机负荷阈值。在确定了为使EBPR具有碳优势而需要分离出水和进水给水后,COD、TN和TP的去除率分别达到98.1%、98.9%和93%。在评估有机负荷剂量时,通过出水与进水给水的比例为2:1至4:1,在比例为3:1后,观察到磷酸盐释放和吸收活性明显下降,尽管所有阶段分别保持在总氮和总磷的排放限值15和5 mg/L内。考虑到废水成分在整个生产过程中的固有波动,出水与进水给水比提供了比COD:N和COD:P比更可靠和更自适应的控制策略。分子分析揭示了驱动EBPR的关键微生物群落,包括Ca_Accumulibacter, decchloromonas和Tetrasphaera。本研究着眼于实际应用和可扩展性,强调了在复杂工业废水处理中保持合适的碳-营养物比例对稳定的生物营养物去除性能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信