Factors affecting vacuum ultraviolet (185 nm) emission intensities in low-pressure mercury lamp photoreactors for photolytic destruction of water contaminants
{"title":"Factors affecting vacuum ultraviolet (185 nm) emission intensities in low-pressure mercury lamp photoreactors for photolytic destruction of water contaminants","authors":"Eman Z. Alhamdan , Daniel Spicer , Ezra L. Cates","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Direct photolysis by 185 nm vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photons emitted by low-pressure mercury (LP-Hg) lamps enables destructive treatment of water contaminants that resist degradation by conventional advanced oxidation processes. The treatment challenges associated with poly-/perfluoroalkyl substances, in particular, have renewed interest VUV photolysis, which offers a relatively simple and effective means of PFAS degradation. Since LP-Hg lamps have traditionally been used more widely in ultraviolet-C applications, output data and operational guidelines specific to VUV applications are more difficult to access or measure. Herein, we assessed perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) photodegradation efficiency using LP-Hg lamp systems from various manufacturers to gauge the variability in 185 nm output and isolate key design and operational aspects. Results indicated a wide variation in VUV output efficiency, with over a 90 % reduction in electrical energy per order destruction (EE/O) between the least and most effective combinations of lamp, ballast, and quartz sleeves, as a result of their physical design aspects. Furthermore, we found that output efficiency was significantly affected by the steady-state temperature achieved when submerged in the photoreactor, relative to the intended operating temperature of the lamp. Consequently, VUV intensity comparisons performed in an N<sub>2</sub>-purged collimated beam with VUV radiometer were not useful predictors of relative performance when submerged in a photoreactor. The results also suggest that many past laboratory studies of VUV photolytic treatment approaches likely used sub-optimal lamp system configurations, resulting in misleading results with respect to the energy efficiency of VUV treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 107909"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471442500981X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Direct photolysis by 185 nm vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photons emitted by low-pressure mercury (LP-Hg) lamps enables destructive treatment of water contaminants that resist degradation by conventional advanced oxidation processes. The treatment challenges associated with poly-/perfluoroalkyl substances, in particular, have renewed interest VUV photolysis, which offers a relatively simple and effective means of PFAS degradation. Since LP-Hg lamps have traditionally been used more widely in ultraviolet-C applications, output data and operational guidelines specific to VUV applications are more difficult to access or measure. Herein, we assessed perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) photodegradation efficiency using LP-Hg lamp systems from various manufacturers to gauge the variability in 185 nm output and isolate key design and operational aspects. Results indicated a wide variation in VUV output efficiency, with over a 90 % reduction in electrical energy per order destruction (EE/O) between the least and most effective combinations of lamp, ballast, and quartz sleeves, as a result of their physical design aspects. Furthermore, we found that output efficiency was significantly affected by the steady-state temperature achieved when submerged in the photoreactor, relative to the intended operating temperature of the lamp. Consequently, VUV intensity comparisons performed in an N2-purged collimated beam with VUV radiometer were not useful predictors of relative performance when submerged in a photoreactor. The results also suggest that many past laboratory studies of VUV photolytic treatment approaches likely used sub-optimal lamp system configurations, resulting in misleading results with respect to the energy efficiency of VUV treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies