Strategic adaptation for online platform retailers in government-regulated digital marketplaces

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sarat Kumar Jena , Purushottam Meena
{"title":"Strategic adaptation for online platform retailers in government-regulated digital marketplaces","authors":"Sarat Kumar Jena ,&nbsp;Purushottam Meena","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the strategic decisions of online platform retailers (OPRs) within government-regulated digital marketplaces, focusing on India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC). The ONDC initiative, aimed at democratizing e-commerce, presents both challenges and opportunities for large and medium-sized OPRs accustomed to traditionally unregulated environments. Employing a Stackelberg game-theoretic model, the study analyzes three scenarios: (1) neither OPR joins ONDC, (2) only one OPR joins ONDC, and (3) both OPRs join ONDC. Each scenario evaluates key factors—pricing strategies, sales efforts, and supply chain profitability—to determine how regulatory frameworks impact competitive dynamics. The findings reveal a trade-off for OPRs between higher short-term profits when abstaining from ONDC and enhanced long-term value through ONDC participation. Specifically, participation in ONDC can facilitate market sustainability and growth for sellers, underscoring the transformative potential of regulated digital ecosystems. This study provides actionable insights for OPRs contemplating ONDC adoption, highlighting the strategic risks such as potential market share erosion and supply chain inefficiency. For policymakers, it emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of OPRs and sellers to foster an inclusive, competitive digital marketplace. By examining the strategic adaptations of OPRs within a government-regulated digital marketplace, this study advances the understanding of regulatory impacts on competitive environments and offers a generalizable framework for decision-making in global digital economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100717"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic decisions of online platform retailers (OPRs) within government-regulated digital marketplaces, focusing on India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC). The ONDC initiative, aimed at democratizing e-commerce, presents both challenges and opportunities for large and medium-sized OPRs accustomed to traditionally unregulated environments. Employing a Stackelberg game-theoretic model, the study analyzes three scenarios: (1) neither OPR joins ONDC, (2) only one OPR joins ONDC, and (3) both OPRs join ONDC. Each scenario evaluates key factors—pricing strategies, sales efforts, and supply chain profitability—to determine how regulatory frameworks impact competitive dynamics. The findings reveal a trade-off for OPRs between higher short-term profits when abstaining from ONDC and enhanced long-term value through ONDC participation. Specifically, participation in ONDC can facilitate market sustainability and growth for sellers, underscoring the transformative potential of regulated digital ecosystems. This study provides actionable insights for OPRs contemplating ONDC adoption, highlighting the strategic risks such as potential market share erosion and supply chain inefficiency. For policymakers, it emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of OPRs and sellers to foster an inclusive, competitive digital marketplace. By examining the strategic adaptations of OPRs within a government-regulated digital marketplace, this study advances the understanding of regulatory impacts on competitive environments and offers a generalizable framework for decision-making in global digital economies.
在线平台零售商在政府监管的数字市场中的战略适应
本研究调查了政府监管的数字市场中在线平台零售商(opr)的战略决策,重点关注印度的数字商务开放网络(ONDC)。ONDC倡议旨在实现电子商务的民主化,这对习惯于传统上不受监管的环境的大中型opr来说既是挑战,也是机遇。采用Stackelberg博弈论模型,分析了三种情况:(1)OPR不加入ONDC,(2)只有一个OPR加入ONDC,(3)两个OPR都加入ONDC。每个场景评估关键因素——定价策略、销售努力和供应链盈利能力——以确定监管框架如何影响竞争动态。研究结果揭示了opr在放弃ONDC时获得更高的短期利润和通过参与ONDC提高长期价值之间的权衡。具体来说,参与ONDC可以促进市场的可持续性和卖家的增长,强调受监管的数字生态系统的变革潜力。本研究为考虑采用ONDC的opr提供了可操作的见解,强调了潜在的市场份额侵蚀和供应链效率低下等战略风险。对于政策制定者来说,它强调了平衡opr和卖家利益的重要性,以促进一个包容、竞争的数字市场。通过研究政府监管的数字市场中OPRs的战略适应性,本研究促进了对监管对竞争环境影响的理解,并为全球数字经济中的决策提供了一个可推广的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信