Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Huihua Xiong, Wei Li, Yuee Teng, Yen-Shen Lu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Min Yan, Hongsheng Li, Danmei Pang, Shin-Cheh -Chen, Wenyan Chen, Ou Jiang, Jingfen Wang, Xinhong Wu, Xian Wang, Aimin Zang, Xiaojia Wang, Julie M. Collins, Ethan Fan, Lin Jiang, Xiaoling Zeng, Nicholas C. Turner
{"title":"Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: phase 3 CAPItello-291 study extended Chinese cohort","authors":"Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Huihua Xiong, Wei Li, Yuee Teng, Yen-Shen Lu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Min Yan, Hongsheng Li, Danmei Pang, Shin-Cheh -Chen, Wenyan Chen, Ou Jiang, Jingfen Wang, Xinhong Wu, Xian Wang, Aimin Zang, Xiaojia Wang, Julie M. Collins, Ethan Fan, Lin Jiang, Xiaoling Zeng, Nicholas C. Turner","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-59210-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the global CAPItello-291 randomized phase 3 study (NCT04305496) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, capivasertib–fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population and patients with <i>PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN</i>-altered tumors versus placebo–fulvestrant. We assessed efficacy and safety of capivasertib–fulvestrant in a prespecified exploratory analysis of a Chinese cohort (<i>n</i> = 24) and extended study with the same protocol (<i>n</i> = 110). Clinically meaningful PFS benefit for capivasertib–fulvestrant was observed in the overall population (median PFS: 6.9 [capivasertib–fulvestrant] versus 2.8 [placebo–fulvestrant] months; hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76), patients with <i>PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN</i>-altered tumors (<i>n</i> = 46; 5.7 versus 1.9 months; hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.85) and <i>PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN</i>-non-altered tumors (patients with confirmed next-generation sequencing results [<i>n</i> = 68]; 9.2 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.21–0.68). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) with capivasertib–fulvestrant were diarrhea (60.6% versus 11.3% with placebo–fulvestrant) and hyperglycemia (57.7% versus 17.7%). AEs leading to capivasertib–fulvestrant discontinuation were reported in 11.3% of patients versus 3.2% for placebo–fulvestrant. The benefit-risk profile of capivasertib–fulvestrant in the Chinese cohort was favorable; further exploration in patients with <i>PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN</i>-non-altered tumors is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59210-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the global CAPItello-291 randomized phase 3 study (NCT04305496) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, capivasertib–fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population and patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors versus placebo–fulvestrant. We assessed efficacy and safety of capivasertib–fulvestrant in a prespecified exploratory analysis of a Chinese cohort (n = 24) and extended study with the same protocol (n = 110). Clinically meaningful PFS benefit for capivasertib–fulvestrant was observed in the overall population (median PFS: 6.9 [capivasertib–fulvestrant] versus 2.8 [placebo–fulvestrant] months; hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76), patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 46; 5.7 versus 1.9 months; hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.85) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors (patients with confirmed next-generation sequencing results [n = 68]; 9.2 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.21–0.68). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) with capivasertib–fulvestrant were diarrhea (60.6% versus 11.3% with placebo–fulvestrant) and hyperglycemia (57.7% versus 17.7%). AEs leading to capivasertib–fulvestrant discontinuation were reported in 11.3% of patients versus 3.2% for placebo–fulvestrant. The benefit-risk profile of capivasertib–fulvestrant in the Chinese cohort was favorable; further exploration in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.