Association between changes in body composition and physical function after intensive behavioral weight-loss intervention: a Look AHEAD trial subgroup analysis.

Kacey Chae,Amie F Bettencourt,Denise K Houston,Eleanor M Simonsick,Luigi Ferrucci,Rita R Kalyani,Nancy Schoenborn,Jeanne M Clark,Kimberly A Gudzune
{"title":"Association between changes in body composition and physical function after intensive behavioral weight-loss intervention: a Look AHEAD trial subgroup analysis.","authors":"Kacey Chae,Amie F Bettencourt,Denise K Houston,Eleanor M Simonsick,Luigi Ferrucci,Rita R Kalyani,Nancy Schoenborn,Jeanne M Clark,Kimberly A Gudzune","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIntentional weight-loss improves physical function among older adults with obesity, despite the associated lean mass loss. However, prior studies have not assessed impacts of weight-loss on physical function and body composition among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, a population at high-risk for sarcopenia and functional decline. Our objective was to examine differences in body composition changes by physical function status among middle-aged and older adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity participating in an intensive weight-loss intervention of diet and exercise over 12 months.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a secondary analysis of 12-month data from the Look AHEAD dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) substudy among participants randomized to intervention (n=603). Independent variables included DXA-derived percent change in appendicular lean mass (ALM) and fat mass (FM). The dependent variable was SF-36 physical function subscale change categorized as worsened (decrease ≥5), stable (change ±4), or improved (increase ≥5). We examined the associations using ANOVA.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOverall, participants had a mean age of 58.3 (SD 6.7) and 63% were women - 8% had worsened, 69% stable, and 22% improved physical function. Differences in mean percent ALM change between physical function groups were non-significant (worsened -3.7%; stable -4.8%; improved -5.6% (p=0.05)). Mean percent FM change was significantly different across physical function groups (worsened -9.3%; stable -14.6%; improved -17.9% (p<0.01)).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nLean mass loss associated with lifestyle weight-loss intervention does not negatively impact physical function, rather the intervention appears to improve physical function by reducing adiposity among adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intentional weight-loss improves physical function among older adults with obesity, despite the associated lean mass loss. However, prior studies have not assessed impacts of weight-loss on physical function and body composition among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, a population at high-risk for sarcopenia and functional decline. Our objective was to examine differences in body composition changes by physical function status among middle-aged and older adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity participating in an intensive weight-loss intervention of diet and exercise over 12 months. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of 12-month data from the Look AHEAD dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) substudy among participants randomized to intervention (n=603). Independent variables included DXA-derived percent change in appendicular lean mass (ALM) and fat mass (FM). The dependent variable was SF-36 physical function subscale change categorized as worsened (decrease ≥5), stable (change ±4), or improved (increase ≥5). We examined the associations using ANOVA. RESULTS Overall, participants had a mean age of 58.3 (SD 6.7) and 63% were women - 8% had worsened, 69% stable, and 22% improved physical function. Differences in mean percent ALM change between physical function groups were non-significant (worsened -3.7%; stable -4.8%; improved -5.6% (p=0.05)). Mean percent FM change was significantly different across physical function groups (worsened -9.3%; stable -14.6%; improved -17.9% (p<0.01)). CONCLUSIONS Lean mass loss associated with lifestyle weight-loss intervention does not negatively impact physical function, rather the intervention appears to improve physical function by reducing adiposity among adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity.
强化行为减肥干预后身体成分变化与身体功能的关系:前瞻性试验亚组分析
背景:有针对性的减肥可以改善老年肥胖患者的身体机能,尽管这与瘦质量的减少有关。然而,之前的研究并没有评估减肥对老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)和肥胖人群的身体功能和身体成分的影响,这是一个肌肉减少症和功能下降的高危人群。我们的目的是研究参加为期12个月的饮食和运动强化减肥干预的中老年2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖患者的身体功能状态对身体成分变化的影响。方法:我们对前瞻性双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)亚研究的12个月数据进行了二次分析,参与者随机分配到干预组(n=603)。自变量包括dxa衍生的阑尾瘦质量(ALM)和脂肪质量(FM)的百分比变化。因变量为SF-36身体功能亚量表变化,分为恶化(下降≥5)、稳定(变化±4)或改善(增加≥5)。我们使用方差分析来检验相关性。总体而言,参与者的平均年龄为58.3岁(SD 6.7),其中63%为女性,其中8%病情恶化,69%病情稳定,22%身体功能改善。身体功能组间ALM平均百分比变化差异无统计学意义(恶化-3.7%;稳定的-4.8%;改善-5.6% (p=0.05)。不同身体功能组的平均FM变化百分比差异显著(恶化-9.3%;稳定的-14.6%;改善-17.9% (p<0.01)。结论:与生活方式减肥干预相关的体重减少不会对身体功能产生负面影响,相反,干预似乎通过减少超重/肥胖的成人2型糖尿病患者的肥胖来改善身体功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信