Walter T McNicholas,Ysbrand D van der Werf,Sarah Hartley,Pierre Philip,
{"title":"Implementation of European National Driving Regulations for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: challenges and recommendations.","authors":"Walter T McNicholas,Ysbrand D van der Werf,Sarah Hartley,Pierre Philip,","doi":"10.1183/13993003.02484-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) carries an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents (MVA), which resulted in the European Commission introducing a legal directive (2014/85/EU) restricting driving in patients with moderate/severe OSA and sleepiness, unless effectively treated. We assessed the implementation of the directive in European Union (EU) member and non-member states.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nNational Sleep Societies and/or selected other sleep specialists in EU member states and selected other European countries completed a questionnaire on the local introduction of the EU Directive, or similar, the OSA severity to restrict driving, criteria to resume driving, and the validity period for different driving licences.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nData were obtained from 25 of 27 EU member states and all 8 non-member states included, representing a population of ∼770 million. All EU members had introduced the Directive into national regulations, largely unchanged, although some countries applied stricter criteria such as mild OSA and a minimum treatment period before resuming driving. Only 5 non-member states had driving regulations for OSA. Problems with implementation of regulations were reported in most countries, including inadequate resources to diagnose/treat OSA patients, excessive restrictions regarding disease severity and certification to resume driving, and under-reporting of symptoms by patients fearing the loss of their licence, especially professional drivers.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDriving regulations for OSA apply in most European countries but excessively strict criteria for OSA severity, sleepiness, and delayed permission to resume driving are questionable. Further research is needed on whether such regulations result in fewer accidents and on the objective identification of sleepiness.","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02484-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) carries an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents (MVA), which resulted in the European Commission introducing a legal directive (2014/85/EU) restricting driving in patients with moderate/severe OSA and sleepiness, unless effectively treated. We assessed the implementation of the directive in European Union (EU) member and non-member states.
METHODS
National Sleep Societies and/or selected other sleep specialists in EU member states and selected other European countries completed a questionnaire on the local introduction of the EU Directive, or similar, the OSA severity to restrict driving, criteria to resume driving, and the validity period for different driving licences.
RESULTS
Data were obtained from 25 of 27 EU member states and all 8 non-member states included, representing a population of ∼770 million. All EU members had introduced the Directive into national regulations, largely unchanged, although some countries applied stricter criteria such as mild OSA and a minimum treatment period before resuming driving. Only 5 non-member states had driving regulations for OSA. Problems with implementation of regulations were reported in most countries, including inadequate resources to diagnose/treat OSA patients, excessive restrictions regarding disease severity and certification to resume driving, and under-reporting of symptoms by patients fearing the loss of their licence, especially professional drivers.
CONCLUSIONS
Driving regulations for OSA apply in most European countries but excessively strict criteria for OSA severity, sleepiness, and delayed permission to resume driving are questionable. Further research is needed on whether such regulations result in fewer accidents and on the objective identification of sleepiness.
期刊介绍:
The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.