Shared sinks alter competitive outcomes via edge effects

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70104
Brian A. Lerch, Senay Yitbarek, Samantha A. Catella
{"title":"Shared sinks alter competitive outcomes via edge effects","authors":"Brian A. Lerch,&nbsp;Senay Yitbarek,&nbsp;Samantha A. Catella","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most work on source-sink dynamics in metacommunities assumes that species have minimal or no niche overlap and thus different sources and sinks. We explore the alternative possibility: competing species have an overlapping set of sources and sinks. Using both implicit-space two-patch (ordinary differential equations) and explicit-space reaction–diffusion (partial differential equations) models, we find that the presence of shared sinks (where neither species can persist indefinitely) allows for a species that would otherwise be driven extinct to exclude its superior competitor, assuming that the species that benefits the most in the source incurs a greater cost than its competitor in the sink. Competitive outcomes are altered when there is an abrupt transition between the source and the sink (i.e., due to an edge effect) because the species that is more tolerant of the sink has a lower net emigration rate at the edge. We discuss how shared sources and sinks relate to previously described trade-offs and potential applications for conservation and restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most work on source-sink dynamics in metacommunities assumes that species have minimal or no niche overlap and thus different sources and sinks. We explore the alternative possibility: competing species have an overlapping set of sources and sinks. Using both implicit-space two-patch (ordinary differential equations) and explicit-space reaction–diffusion (partial differential equations) models, we find that the presence of shared sinks (where neither species can persist indefinitely) allows for a species that would otherwise be driven extinct to exclude its superior competitor, assuming that the species that benefits the most in the source incurs a greater cost than its competitor in the sink. Competitive outcomes are altered when there is an abrupt transition between the source and the sink (i.e., due to an edge effect) because the species that is more tolerant of the sink has a lower net emigration rate at the edge. We discuss how shared sources and sinks relate to previously described trade-offs and potential applications for conservation and restoration.

共享汇通过边缘效应改变竞争结果
大多数关于元群落源汇动态的研究都假设物种的生态位重叠很少或没有重叠,因此存在不同的源汇。我们探索了另一种可能性:竞争物种有一组重叠的源和汇。使用隐式空间双斑块(常微分方程)和显式空间反应扩散(偏微分方程)模型,我们发现共享汇的存在(两个物种都不能无限期地持续下去)允许一个物种排除其优越的竞争对手,否则将被灭绝,假设在源中受益最多的物种比在汇中的竞争对手产生更大的成本。当源和汇之间发生突变(即,由于边缘效应)时,竞争结果就会发生改变,因为对汇更具耐受性的物种在边缘处的净迁移率较低。我们讨论了共享源和汇如何与先前描述的权衡和保护和恢复的潜在应用相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信