Implication of soil grid sampling on lime, phosphorus, and potassium management of corn

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Manuel Marcaida III, Kirsten Workman, Quirine M. Ketterings
{"title":"Implication of soil grid sampling on lime, phosphorus, and potassium management of corn","authors":"Manuel Marcaida III,&nbsp;Kirsten Workman,&nbsp;Quirine M. Ketterings","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grid-based soil sampling captures within-field fertility variability, enabling site-specific lime and fertilizer management but at a high cost. This study grid-sampled 20 corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) fields in New York to (1) document spatial variability in soil series, pH, soil test phosphorus (P), and potassium (K); (2) assess the impact of grid size (0.2, 0.4, 1.0 ha/grid) on field-based lime, P, and K recommendations compared to whole-field sampling for corn with and without alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) in the rotation; and (3) derive guidance for soil sampling beyond the initial grid-based sampling event. Soil pH was measured using a 1:1 soil-to-water mixture, while P and K were extracted or converted to Morgan equivalents. Soil pH ranged from 6.2 to 7.4, while P and K varied from 3 to 177 mg P/kg and 22 to 213 mg K/kg, respectively. Grid-based management led to higher recommended lime rates, especially for fields in alfalfa rotations. For P, grid-based decision-making increased the recommended amount of fertilizer for many fields. For K, several fields showed potential fertilizer savings. In most fields requiring lime applications, the amount recommended increased with grid size, whereas for P and K, smaller grid sizes resulted in higher recommendations. Grid-based soil measurements were converted to soil test-based management zones, providing both a transition from regular grid sampling in the initial year to more cost-effective zone-based sampling in future years, and a means to homogenize the field with targeted lime and fertilizer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grid-based soil sampling captures within-field fertility variability, enabling site-specific lime and fertilizer management but at a high cost. This study grid-sampled 20 corn (Zea mays L.) fields in New York to (1) document spatial variability in soil series, pH, soil test phosphorus (P), and potassium (K); (2) assess the impact of grid size (0.2, 0.4, 1.0 ha/grid) on field-based lime, P, and K recommendations compared to whole-field sampling for corn with and without alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in the rotation; and (3) derive guidance for soil sampling beyond the initial grid-based sampling event. Soil pH was measured using a 1:1 soil-to-water mixture, while P and K were extracted or converted to Morgan equivalents. Soil pH ranged from 6.2 to 7.4, while P and K varied from 3 to 177 mg P/kg and 22 to 213 mg K/kg, respectively. Grid-based management led to higher recommended lime rates, especially for fields in alfalfa rotations. For P, grid-based decision-making increased the recommended amount of fertilizer for many fields. For K, several fields showed potential fertilizer savings. In most fields requiring lime applications, the amount recommended increased with grid size, whereas for P and K, smaller grid sizes resulted in higher recommendations. Grid-based soil measurements were converted to soil test-based management zones, providing both a transition from regular grid sampling in the initial year to more cost-effective zone-based sampling in future years, and a means to homogenize the field with targeted lime and fertilizer management.

Abstract Image

土壤网格取样对玉米石灰、磷、钾管理的启示
基于网格的土壤采样捕获了田间肥力的变化,实现了特定地点的石灰和肥料管理,但成本很高。本研究在纽约对20块玉米(Zea mays L.)田进行网格取样,以(1)记录土壤系列、pH值、土壤试验磷(P)和钾(K)的空间变异;(2)评估栅格大小(0.2、0.4、1.0公顷/栅格)对田间石灰、磷和钾推荐量的影响,并与轮作中有无苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的玉米进行全田取样进行比较;(3)推导出超出初始网格采样事件的土壤采样指导。土壤pH值测量采用1:1的土壤-水混合物,而P和K被提取或转换为摩根当量。土壤pH值为6.2 ~ 7.4,磷、钾分别为3 ~ 177 mg P/kg和22 ~ 213 mg K/kg。基于网格的管理导致了更高的推荐石灰率,特别是对苜蓿轮作的田地。对于磷,基于网格的决策增加了许多田地的推荐施肥量。对于K,有几块田显示出潜在的肥料节约。在大多数需要石灰施用的领域,建议用量随着网格尺寸的增加而增加,而对于磷和钾,较小的网格尺寸导致较高的建议用量。基于网格的土壤测量被转换为基于土壤测试的管理区域,既提供了从第一年的常规网格采样到未来几年更具成本效益的基于区域的采样的过渡,也提供了一种通过有针对性的石灰和肥料管理来均匀化田地的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信