{"title":"Do the Relative Importance and Pattern of Correlates of Suicidal Ideation Vary by Age and Gender? Network Analyses","authors":"Hyeju Ha, Eun-Jung Shim","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined age- and gender-related differences in correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) and their interrelationships. We used data from a nationally representative sample of adults aged 19 years or older who participated in the 2021 Korea Welfare Panel Study (<i>N</i> = 10,364). We examined six networks of SI and its sociodemographic, physical health, and psychological correlates by age (young, 19–39 years; middle-aged, 40–64 years; and old, over 65 years old) and by gender. Depression, subjective well-being (SWB), and self-esteem were the key SI correlates across all groups. Depression had the strongest direct associations with SI in all groups (edge weights: 0.23 in old women to 1.00 in middle-aged men). SWB was directly associated with SI in middle-aged men (−0.26), middle-aged women (0.27), and old women (−0.37). Self-esteem was indirectly related to SI through depression and SWB. Age- and gender-specific correlates included chronic illness for young women, job satisfaction and subjective physical health for middle-aged women, and family relationship satisfaction for older men and women, each showing stronger associations with SI than other correlates within their respective groups. Suicide prevention efforts may benefit from addressing both common and age- and gender-specific correlates of SI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined age- and gender-related differences in correlates of suicidal ideation (SI) and their interrelationships. We used data from a nationally representative sample of adults aged 19 years or older who participated in the 2021 Korea Welfare Panel Study (N = 10,364). We examined six networks of SI and its sociodemographic, physical health, and psychological correlates by age (young, 19–39 years; middle-aged, 40–64 years; and old, over 65 years old) and by gender. Depression, subjective well-being (SWB), and self-esteem were the key SI correlates across all groups. Depression had the strongest direct associations with SI in all groups (edge weights: 0.23 in old women to 1.00 in middle-aged men). SWB was directly associated with SI in middle-aged men (−0.26), middle-aged women (0.27), and old women (−0.37). Self-esteem was indirectly related to SI through depression and SWB. Age- and gender-specific correlates included chronic illness for young women, job satisfaction and subjective physical health for middle-aged women, and family relationship satisfaction for older men and women, each showing stronger associations with SI than other correlates within their respective groups. Suicide prevention efforts may benefit from addressing both common and age- and gender-specific correlates of SI.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.