The State of the Systems Engineering Discipline: A Longitudinal Analysis of INCOSE International Symposium Contributions (2012–2025)

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Insight Pub Date : 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1002/inst.12534
Christian Sprague PhD
{"title":"The State of the Systems Engineering Discipline: A Longitudinal Analysis of INCOSE International Symposium Contributions (2012–2025)","authors":"Christian Sprague PhD","doi":"10.1002/inst.12534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This first-of-its-kind meta-analysis provides unprecedented insights into systems engineering's evolution through a comprehensive examination of fourteen years of INCOSE International Symposium contributions. By analyzing over 4,000 submissions from nearly 5,000 authors, this study delivers unique value through three interconnected analyses: The Authors Analysis reveals a distinctive “hourglass network” where 10% of contributors generate 43% of intellectual output, alongside a critical 94% first-year attrition rate. This social architecture illuminates both resilience mechanisms and vulnerability points within the knowledge ecosystem, offering stakeholders targeted intervention opportunities for community development. The Topics Analysis documents the discipline's methodological transformation, quantifying the shift toward model-based systems engineering (MBSE) growing from 30% to 40% while revealing persistent knowledge gaps in theoretical foundations and empirical validation. The detailed taxonomic classification exposes high-value research frontiers at disciplinary intersections previously unidentified. The Acceptance Analysis uncovers systematic patterns in knowledge validation, demonstrating how acceptance rates have tightened year-over-year (90% to 40%) while certain submission characteristics significantly impact outcomes. This evidence-based filter mechanism provides contributors with strategic insights for knowledge dissemination. Through synthesizing these analyses, this research provides a cohesive portrait of a discipline at an inflection point—transitioning from practice-driven origins toward greater formalization. For INCOSE leadership, educators, and practitioners, these integrated insights enable data-driven strategies to strengthen community resilience, address knowledge gaps, and enhance systems engineering's capacity to tackle the increasingly complex sociotechnical challenges of the 21st century.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13956,"journal":{"name":"Insight","volume":"28 2","pages":"9-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inst.12534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This first-of-its-kind meta-analysis provides unprecedented insights into systems engineering's evolution through a comprehensive examination of fourteen years of INCOSE International Symposium contributions. By analyzing over 4,000 submissions from nearly 5,000 authors, this study delivers unique value through three interconnected analyses: The Authors Analysis reveals a distinctive “hourglass network” where 10% of contributors generate 43% of intellectual output, alongside a critical 94% first-year attrition rate. This social architecture illuminates both resilience mechanisms and vulnerability points within the knowledge ecosystem, offering stakeholders targeted intervention opportunities for community development. The Topics Analysis documents the discipline's methodological transformation, quantifying the shift toward model-based systems engineering (MBSE) growing from 30% to 40% while revealing persistent knowledge gaps in theoretical foundations and empirical validation. The detailed taxonomic classification exposes high-value research frontiers at disciplinary intersections previously unidentified. The Acceptance Analysis uncovers systematic patterns in knowledge validation, demonstrating how acceptance rates have tightened year-over-year (90% to 40%) while certain submission characteristics significantly impact outcomes. This evidence-based filter mechanism provides contributors with strategic insights for knowledge dissemination. Through synthesizing these analyses, this research provides a cohesive portrait of a discipline at an inflection point—transitioning from practice-driven origins toward greater formalization. For INCOSE leadership, educators, and practitioners, these integrated insights enable data-driven strategies to strengthen community resilience, address knowledge gaps, and enhance systems engineering's capacity to tackle the increasingly complex sociotechnical challenges of the 21st century.

系统工程学科的现状:对INCOSE国际研讨会贡献的纵向分析(2012-2025)
这一首创的荟萃分析通过对十四年INCOSE国际研讨会贡献的全面检查,为系统工程的演变提供了前所未有的见解。通过分析来自近5000名作者的4000多份投稿,这项研究通过三个相互关联的分析提供了独特的价值:作者分析揭示了一个独特的“沙漏网络”,其中10%的贡献者创造了43%的智力产出,而第一年的流失率则达到了94%。这种社会架构阐明了知识生态系统中的弹性机制和脆弱性点,为利益相关者提供了有针对性的社区发展干预机会。主题分析记录了该学科的方法论转变,量化了向基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)的转变,从30%增长到40%,同时揭示了理论基础和经验验证中持续存在的知识差距。详细的分类学分类揭示了以前未确定的学科交叉领域的高价值研究前沿。验收分析揭示了知识验证的系统模式,展示了验收率如何逐年收紧(90%到40%),而某些提交特征显著影响结果。这种基于证据的过滤机制为贡献者提供了知识传播的战略见解。通过综合这些分析,本研究提供了一个学科在一个拐点的有凝聚力的肖像——从实践驱动的起源到更大的形式化。对于INCOSE的领导、教育工作者和从业者来说,这些综合的见解使数据驱动的战略能够加强社区的弹性,解决知识差距,并增强系统工程的能力,以应对21世纪日益复杂的社会技术挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insight
Insight 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Official Journal of The British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing - includes original research and devlopment papers, technical and scientific reviews and case studies in the fields of NDT and CM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信