Louise Laverty , Jasper Palmier-Claus , Rebecca Harris , Christopher Lodge , Neil Caton , Abigail Morris , Fiona Lobban
{"title":"Mediating candidacy: Qualitative study of a link work intervention to support individuals with severe mental ill health to access dental care","authors":"Louise Laverty , Jasper Palmier-Claus , Rebecca Harris , Christopher Lodge , Neil Caton , Abigail Morris , Fiona Lobban","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vulnerable and socially excluded groups in society persistently experience worse oral health and poorer access to dental services than the mainstream population. This article reports on the qualitative component of a feasibility trial evaluating a link work intervention to support individuals with severe mental illness to access dental healthcare in Northwest England. Using the Candidacy Model as a conceptual framework, interviews with eighteen participants and the three link workers were carried out to explore the challenges individuals face in navigating access to dental services and how this is negotiated with health professionals and systems. The findings show how the consequences and significance of poor mental health impede access to dental care that is already scarce and hard to reach. The link workers mediated candidacy by taking on some of the burdens of access and providing a buffer to power differentials built into the healthcare system. They provided person-centred support that participants valued as holistic and non-judgemental. As a result, participants felt more able and willing to return to dental services in the future. The discussion considers how the literature on candidacy can be helpful in understanding how link work interventions may reduce inequalities in access for vulnerable groups but are dependent on wider organisational conditions and provision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 118044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vulnerable and socially excluded groups in society persistently experience worse oral health and poorer access to dental services than the mainstream population. This article reports on the qualitative component of a feasibility trial evaluating a link work intervention to support individuals with severe mental illness to access dental healthcare in Northwest England. Using the Candidacy Model as a conceptual framework, interviews with eighteen participants and the three link workers were carried out to explore the challenges individuals face in navigating access to dental services and how this is negotiated with health professionals and systems. The findings show how the consequences and significance of poor mental health impede access to dental care that is already scarce and hard to reach. The link workers mediated candidacy by taking on some of the burdens of access and providing a buffer to power differentials built into the healthcare system. They provided person-centred support that participants valued as holistic and non-judgemental. As a result, participants felt more able and willing to return to dental services in the future. The discussion considers how the literature on candidacy can be helpful in understanding how link work interventions may reduce inequalities in access for vulnerable groups but are dependent on wider organisational conditions and provision.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.