{"title":"Patent citations and acquisition premiums: A screeningperspective","authors":"Manjot S. Bhussar , Brian C. Fox , Sergio Grove","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While extant acquisition literature explores how intentional signaling between the acquiring and target firms can influence acquisition outcomes, we examine how unintentional information revealed through prior actions taken long before an acquisition is contemplated – specifically patent citation patterns between the firms – influences acquisition outcomes. We argue that targets can screen patent citation imbalances between acquirer and target to reduce information asymmetry regarding potential joint value creation. When the acquirer cites the target's patents more than the reverse, the target is better able to infer knowledge dependence or private synergies stemming from the complementary knowledge bases of each firm. The reduction of information asymmetry permits the target to capture a higher acquisition premium justified by these anticipated synergies or dependencies. Using a sample of acquisitions between US high-tech firms from 2005 to 2021, we find support for our thesis when the acquirer's patent portfolio is diverse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 3","pages":"Article 102534"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630125000378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While extant acquisition literature explores how intentional signaling between the acquiring and target firms can influence acquisition outcomes, we examine how unintentional information revealed through prior actions taken long before an acquisition is contemplated – specifically patent citation patterns between the firms – influences acquisition outcomes. We argue that targets can screen patent citation imbalances between acquirer and target to reduce information asymmetry regarding potential joint value creation. When the acquirer cites the target's patents more than the reverse, the target is better able to infer knowledge dependence or private synergies stemming from the complementary knowledge bases of each firm. The reduction of information asymmetry permits the target to capture a higher acquisition premium justified by these anticipated synergies or dependencies. Using a sample of acquisitions between US high-tech firms from 2005 to 2021, we find support for our thesis when the acquirer's patent portfolio is diverse.
期刊介绍:
Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.