Eficacia comparativa del aripiprazol de liberación prolongada: estudio de administración mensual versus bimestral en pacientes con trastorno mental grave

Q4 Medicine
Angela Izquierdo de la Puente , Pablo del Sol Calderón , Roberto Fernández Fernández , María García Moreno , Miguel Vizcaíno Da Silva
{"title":"Eficacia comparativa del aripiprazol de liberación prolongada: estudio de administración mensual versus bimestral en pacientes con trastorno mental grave","authors":"Angela Izquierdo de la Puente ,&nbsp;Pablo del Sol Calderón ,&nbsp;Roberto Fernández Fernández ,&nbsp;María García Moreno ,&nbsp;Miguel Vizcaíno Da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.psiq.2025.100725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comparison of the efficacy of monthly and bimonthly aripiprazole extended-release aripiprazole in patients with severe mental disorder on outpatient follow-up was conducted. Extended-release aripiprazole is an antipsychotic used in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in stabilised adults. The extended-release injectable (ERI) formulation has been shown to increase adherence and reduce relapse rates compared to oral antipsychotics. In the case described, patients with a mean age of 45 years and diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and delusional disorder were psychopathologically stable for more than a year on monthly aripiprazole treatment (400 mg or 300 mg). Three months ago, treatment was changed to bimonthly administration of 960 mg.</div><div>Comparing the efficacy: in psychopathological stability, patients have remained stable, without relapse or symptomatology, during the three months following the switch to bimonthly administration. This suggests that the efficacy of the bimonthly formulation is comparable to the monthly formulation in terms of maintaining clinical stability. Regarding the treatment adherence, the bimonthly formulation (Abilify Maintena 960 mg every two months) allows for better adherence to treatment. This is because it reduces the frequency of administration, which may be beneficial for patients on outpatient follow-up. In drug levels, the bimonthly formulation avoids sharp peaks and troughs in drug levels, which may result in better symptom control and a reduction in the frequency of relapses. With regard to patient follow-up, although bimonthly administration reduces the frequency of visits to receive treatment, it still allows healthcare professionals to maintain regular contact with patients, improving follow-up and assessment of their progress. In patient preference, the TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) questionnaire mentioned in the study will allow assessment of patient satisfaction with treatment, which is crucial for comparing perceived efficacy between monthly and bimonthly formulations.</div><div>It is important to note that although initial results appear promising, the three-month observation period is relatively short. Long-term follow-up is recommended to confirm the sustained efficacy of the bimonthly formulation compared to the monthly formulation. In conclusion, based on the sustained stability of patients and the potential advantages in terms of adherence and medication levels, the bimonthly extended-release formulation of aripiprazole appears to be as effective as the monthly formulation in the maintenance treatment of patients with severe mental disorder on outpatient follow-up. However, long-term studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39337,"journal":{"name":"Psiquiatria Biologica","volume":"32 3","pages":"Article 100725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psiquiatria Biologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134593425000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparison of the efficacy of monthly and bimonthly aripiprazole extended-release aripiprazole in patients with severe mental disorder on outpatient follow-up was conducted. Extended-release aripiprazole is an antipsychotic used in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in stabilised adults. The extended-release injectable (ERI) formulation has been shown to increase adherence and reduce relapse rates compared to oral antipsychotics. In the case described, patients with a mean age of 45 years and diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and delusional disorder were psychopathologically stable for more than a year on monthly aripiprazole treatment (400 mg or 300 mg). Three months ago, treatment was changed to bimonthly administration of 960 mg.
Comparing the efficacy: in psychopathological stability, patients have remained stable, without relapse or symptomatology, during the three months following the switch to bimonthly administration. This suggests that the efficacy of the bimonthly formulation is comparable to the monthly formulation in terms of maintaining clinical stability. Regarding the treatment adherence, the bimonthly formulation (Abilify Maintena 960 mg every two months) allows for better adherence to treatment. This is because it reduces the frequency of administration, which may be beneficial for patients on outpatient follow-up. In drug levels, the bimonthly formulation avoids sharp peaks and troughs in drug levels, which may result in better symptom control and a reduction in the frequency of relapses. With regard to patient follow-up, although bimonthly administration reduces the frequency of visits to receive treatment, it still allows healthcare professionals to maintain regular contact with patients, improving follow-up and assessment of their progress. In patient preference, the TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) questionnaire mentioned in the study will allow assessment of patient satisfaction with treatment, which is crucial for comparing perceived efficacy between monthly and bimonthly formulations.
It is important to note that although initial results appear promising, the three-month observation period is relatively short. Long-term follow-up is recommended to confirm the sustained efficacy of the bimonthly formulation compared to the monthly formulation. In conclusion, based on the sustained stability of patients and the potential advantages in terms of adherence and medication levels, the bimonthly extended-release formulation of aripiprazole appears to be as effective as the monthly formulation in the maintenance treatment of patients with severe mental disorder on outpatient follow-up. However, long-term studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
阿利哌唑缓释药物的比较疗效:对严重精神障碍患者的月度与月度对照研究
对阿立哌唑缓释治疗重症精神障碍患者进行月度与双月随访,比较其疗效。缓释阿立哌唑是一种抗精神病药物,用于稳定的成人精神分裂症的维持治疗。与口服抗精神病药物相比,缓释注射(ERI)制剂已被证明可增加依从性并降低复发率。在上述病例中,平均年龄为45岁、诊断为偏执型精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和妄想障碍的患者在每月接受阿立哌唑治疗(400 mg或300 mg)后,精神病理稳定超过一年。三个月前,治疗改为每两个月给药960 mg。比较疗效:在精神病理稳定性方面,患者在改为每两个月给药后的三个月内保持稳定,无复发或症状。这表明,在维持临床稳定性方面,双月配方的功效与每月配方相当。关于治疗依从性,双月配方(Abilify Maintena 960 每两个月毫克)允许更好地坚持治疗。这是因为它减少了给药的频率,这可能对门诊随访的患者有益。在药物水平上,每两个月一次的配方避免了药物水平的尖峰和低谷,这可能导致更好的症状控制和减少复发的频率。在病人随访方面,虽然每两个月给药一次减少了病人接受治疗的次数,但它仍然使保健专业人员能够与病人保持定期联系,改善随访和评估他们的进展。在患者偏好方面,研究中提到的TSQM(药物治疗满意度问卷)问卷将允许评估患者对治疗的满意度,这对于比较每月和每月配方的感知疗效至关重要。值得注意的是,虽然初步结果看起来很有希望,但三个月的观察期相对较短。建议进行长期随访,以确认与每月服药相比,双月服药的持续疗效。综上所述,基于患者的持续稳定性以及依从性和用药水平方面的潜在优势,在门诊随访中,阿立哌唑每两个月缓释剂型与每月剂型在重度精神障碍患者的维持治疗中同样有效。然而,需要更大样本的长期研究来证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psiquiatria Biologica
Psiquiatria Biologica Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Psiquiatría Biológica. Los recientes avances en el conocimiento de la bioquímica y de la fisiología cerebrales y el progreso en general en el campo de las neurociencias han abierto el camino al desarrollo de la psiquiatría biológica, fundada sobre bases anatomofisiológicas, más sólidas y científicas que la psiquiatría tradicional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信