Abordaje clínico y terapéutico del trastorno bipolar en España: una encuesta nacional

Q4 Medicine
Pilar Sierra
{"title":"Abordaje clínico y terapéutico del trastorno bipolar en España: una encuesta nacional","authors":"Pilar Sierra","doi":"10.1016/j.psiq.2025.100728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Bipolar disorder is characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations, which complicate its diagnosis and treatment. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, their application is limited. This study analyzes the clinical and therapeutic approaches adopted by professionals involved in its management in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 50-item, anonymous and voluntary self-administered survey of 83 psychiatrists was carried out. Diagnostic, clinical and therapeutic aspects were addressed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>90% of the psychiatrists stated that they followed clinical guidelines, but gave priority to their personal experience when choosing the treatment. Forty-six percent never used psychometric scales. Mixed episodes were considered the most difficult to treat and depressive episodes were considered to have the greatest functional impact. Lithium was the most commonly used stabilizer in type I bipolar disorder, and antipsychotics in type II. Forty-two percent avoided prescribing lithium in patients over 65 years of age. Valproate was prescribed to women of childbearing age by 30%. Quetiapine was the most commonly used antipsychotic in maintenance and bipolar depression. Confidence in therapeutic adherence was low. Electroconvulsive therapy was considered an effective alternative by 48% and transcranial magnetic stimulation by 11%. Almost half did not perceive a significant impact of suicide prevention and stigma reduction campaigns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study highlights consensus and discrepancies in the approach to bipolar disorder, evidencing variability in prescription patterns. It highlights the relevance of continuous training and the need to promote greater adherence to clinical guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39337,"journal":{"name":"Psiquiatria Biologica","volume":"32 3","pages":"Article 100728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psiquiatria Biologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134593425000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Bipolar disorder is characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations, which complicate its diagnosis and treatment. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, their application is limited. This study analyzes the clinical and therapeutic approaches adopted by professionals involved in its management in Spain.

Methods

A 50-item, anonymous and voluntary self-administered survey of 83 psychiatrists was carried out. Diagnostic, clinical and therapeutic aspects were addressed.

Results

90% of the psychiatrists stated that they followed clinical guidelines, but gave priority to their personal experience when choosing the treatment. Forty-six percent never used psychometric scales. Mixed episodes were considered the most difficult to treat and depressive episodes were considered to have the greatest functional impact. Lithium was the most commonly used stabilizer in type I bipolar disorder, and antipsychotics in type II. Forty-two percent avoided prescribing lithium in patients over 65 years of age. Valproate was prescribed to women of childbearing age by 30%. Quetiapine was the most commonly used antipsychotic in maintenance and bipolar depression. Confidence in therapeutic adherence was low. Electroconvulsive therapy was considered an effective alternative by 48% and transcranial magnetic stimulation by 11%. Almost half did not perceive a significant impact of suicide prevention and stigma reduction campaigns.

Conclusions

The study highlights consensus and discrepancies in the approach to bipolar disorder, evidencing variability in prescription patterns. It highlights the relevance of continuous training and the need to promote greater adherence to clinical guidelines.
西班牙双相情感障碍的临床和治疗方法:全国调查
双相情感障碍具有多种临床表现,使其诊断和治疗复杂化。尽管有基于证据的指南,但它们的应用是有限的。本研究分析了西班牙参与其管理的专业人员所采用的临床和治疗方法。方法对83名精神科医生进行50项匿名自愿问卷调查。讨论了诊断、临床和治疗方面的问题。结果90%的精神科医生表示他们遵循临床指南,但在选择治疗时优先考虑他们的个人经验。46%的人从未使用过心理测量量表。混合发作被认为是最难治疗的,而抑郁发作被认为对功能有最大的影响。锂是I型双相情感障碍最常用的稳定剂,II型双相情感障碍最常用的抗精神病药物。42%的医生避免给65岁以上的患者开锂处方。30%的育龄妇女开丙戊酸盐。喹硫平是维持期和双相抑郁症中最常用的抗精神病药物。对治疗依从性的信心较低。48%的人认为电痉挛疗法是有效的替代疗法,11%的人认为经颅磁刺激是有效的替代疗法。几乎一半的人没有意识到预防自杀和减少耻辱运动的重大影响。结论:该研究强调了双相情感障碍治疗方法的共识和差异,证明了处方模式的可变性。它强调了持续培训的相关性和促进更严格遵守临床指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psiquiatria Biologica
Psiquiatria Biologica Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Psiquiatría Biológica. Los recientes avances en el conocimiento de la bioquímica y de la fisiología cerebrales y el progreso en general en el campo de las neurociencias han abierto el camino al desarrollo de la psiquiatría biológica, fundada sobre bases anatomofisiológicas, más sólidas y científicas que la psiquiatría tradicional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信