Teis Hansen , Bård Torvetjønn Haugland , Markus Steen , Nils Oskar Tronrud
{"title":"Capturing context: A sociotechnical feasibility assessment of carbon capture and storage in Norwegian waste incineration","authors":"Teis Hansen , Bård Torvetjønn Haugland , Markus Steen , Nils Oskar Tronrud","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to decarbonisation of the waste-to-energy industry. We complement existing lifecycle assessments and techno-economic analyses of CCS in waste-to-energy with a socio-technical perspective that emphasises interrelations between technologies, practices, institutions, and infrastructures in supporting (or not) development and diffusion of novel solutions such as CCS. More specifically, we assess the feasibility of CCS implementation in waste-to-energy through examining four Norwegian cases with regards to both general (national-sectoral) and local conditions. The feasibility assessment addresses four key dimensions: maturity of technology, developing CCS infrastructure and integration with existing systems, political feasibility, and social acceptance. Drawing on insights from the geography of sustainability transitions literature, we analyse these dimensions considering both general-sectoral and local conditions. Our findings reveal that the feasibility of CCS implementation is influenced by a variety of factors that are shared across the waste-to-energy industry in Norway, as well as highly localised factors at the plant or municipal level. These factors imply that there are limits to opportunities for direct implementation of newly commercialised technologies in other waste-to-energy contexts. From a policy perspective, the importance of such localised factors suggests that investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer plants, and that different policy instruments may be needed for different plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104118"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to decarbonisation of the waste-to-energy industry. We complement existing lifecycle assessments and techno-economic analyses of CCS in waste-to-energy with a socio-technical perspective that emphasises interrelations between technologies, practices, institutions, and infrastructures in supporting (or not) development and diffusion of novel solutions such as CCS. More specifically, we assess the feasibility of CCS implementation in waste-to-energy through examining four Norwegian cases with regards to both general (national-sectoral) and local conditions. The feasibility assessment addresses four key dimensions: maturity of technology, developing CCS infrastructure and integration with existing systems, political feasibility, and social acceptance. Drawing on insights from the geography of sustainability transitions literature, we analyse these dimensions considering both general-sectoral and local conditions. Our findings reveal that the feasibility of CCS implementation is influenced by a variety of factors that are shared across the waste-to-energy industry in Norway, as well as highly localised factors at the plant or municipal level. These factors imply that there are limits to opportunities for direct implementation of newly commercialised technologies in other waste-to-energy contexts. From a policy perspective, the importance of such localised factors suggests that investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer plants, and that different policy instruments may be needed for different plants.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.