Understanding the effects of vehicle portfolios on plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs)-adopting households’ vehicle replacement decision: an application of vehicles transaction model

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jean Y. Ji , David S. Bunch , Alan Jenn
{"title":"Understanding the effects of vehicle portfolios on plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs)-adopting households’ vehicle replacement decision: an application of vehicles transaction model","authors":"Jean Y. Ji ,&nbsp;David S. Bunch ,&nbsp;Alan Jenn","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) adoption to date has focused on understanding consumers' vehicle purchase decisions as single vehicle transactions. This research expands on this decision-making process by employing a vehicle transaction model to account for vehicle portfolio preferences at the household level. By leveraging discrete choice modeling techniques, specifically mixed multinomial logistic regression, we evaluate a sample of two-vehicle and PEV-adopting Californian households' vehicle transactions from 2017 to 2020. Our results demonstrate that there are strong complementarities among certain vehicle classes. Namely, PEV-adopting households are more likely to pair a car with a large truck or a SUV than with another car. Fuel type complementarities are also observed as households prefer to own a PEV and an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) rather than a PEV-PEV portfolio. We also investigate households' income elasticity of choice for PEVs by quantifying their income sensitivity to the capital costs and operating costs of their vehicle portfolios. The implications of our work are two-fold: by applying the vehicle transaction model to empirical data, we estimate households’ preference parameters for PEVs attributes and portfolios. These results contribute to the growing literature on the quantitative understanding of vehicle replacement decisions for PEV-adopting households. Our work also has implications for the projection of vehicle fleets, where understanding how households take vehicle portfolio complementarities into account is essential for future projections of vehicle fleets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) adoption to date has focused on understanding consumers' vehicle purchase decisions as single vehicle transactions. This research expands on this decision-making process by employing a vehicle transaction model to account for vehicle portfolio preferences at the household level. By leveraging discrete choice modeling techniques, specifically mixed multinomial logistic regression, we evaluate a sample of two-vehicle and PEV-adopting Californian households' vehicle transactions from 2017 to 2020. Our results demonstrate that there are strong complementarities among certain vehicle classes. Namely, PEV-adopting households are more likely to pair a car with a large truck or a SUV than with another car. Fuel type complementarities are also observed as households prefer to own a PEV and an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) rather than a PEV-PEV portfolio. We also investigate households' income elasticity of choice for PEVs by quantifying their income sensitivity to the capital costs and operating costs of their vehicle portfolios. The implications of our work are two-fold: by applying the vehicle transaction model to empirical data, we estimate households’ preference parameters for PEVs attributes and portfolios. These results contribute to the growing literature on the quantitative understanding of vehicle replacement decisions for PEV-adopting households. Our work also has implications for the projection of vehicle fleets, where understanding how households take vehicle portfolio complementarities into account is essential for future projections of vehicle fleets.
了解车辆组合对插电式电动汽车的影响——采用家庭车辆更换决策:车辆交易模型的应用
迄今为止,对插电式电动汽车(pev)采用的研究主要集中在将消费者的汽车购买决策理解为单辆汽车交易。本研究通过采用车辆交易模型来解释家庭层面的车辆组合偏好,扩展了这一决策过程。通过利用离散选择建模技术,特别是混合多项逻辑回归,我们评估了2017年至2020年采用两辆车和电动汽车的加州家庭车辆交易样本。我们的研究结果表明,某些车辆类别之间存在很强的互补性。也就是说,采用电动汽车的家庭更有可能将一辆汽车与大型卡车或SUV配对,而不是与另一辆汽车配对。燃料类型的互补性也被观察到,因为家庭更喜欢拥有PEV和内燃机汽车(ICEV),而不是PEV-PEV组合。我们还通过量化家庭对其车辆组合的资本成本和运营成本的收入敏感性来研究家庭对pev选择的收入弹性。我们的工作具有双重意义:通过将车辆交易模型应用于经验数据,我们估计了家庭对pev属性和投资组合的偏好参数。这些结果有助于越来越多的文献对采用电动汽车的家庭的车辆更换决策的定量理解。我们的工作对车队的预测也有影响,其中了解家庭如何考虑车辆组合的互补性对于车队的未来预测至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信