French evaluation of innovative health technologies: Early access and fundings

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Capucine Serain , Sylvie Chevret , Yann Chambon , Vanessa Hernando , Françoise Lucet , Samuel Seksik , Hassan Serrier , Elodie Velzenberger Maquart , Pierre Cochat
{"title":"French evaluation of innovative health technologies: Early access and fundings","authors":"Capucine Serain ,&nbsp;Sylvie Chevret ,&nbsp;Yann Chambon ,&nbsp;Vanessa Hernando ,&nbsp;Françoise Lucet ,&nbsp;Samuel Seksik ,&nbsp;Hassan Serrier ,&nbsp;Elodie Velzenberger Maquart ,&nbsp;Pierre Cochat","doi":"10.1016/j.lpm.2025.104284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To accelerate the availability of innovative healthcare technologies for patients with the potential for significant clinical benefits in a context of high unmet needs, derogatory programs have been elaborated. The aim of this paper is to describe the different pathways developed in France to accelerate access to innovation, efficiently handle uncertainties while controlling the risks for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We first describe the different early and temporary accesses to innovation in France involving the HAS. Feedback on these pathways based on the decisions provided by the HAS up until June 2024, is summarised and discussed. Subsequent emphasis is placed on the challenges of the evaluation process.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>French derogatory pathways for innovation distinguish between medicinal products, medical devices (MDs) and procedures, as well as the funding mechanism. Early funding is dedicated to MDs, in vitro diagnostic MDs and procedures. Later fast-track access is dedicated to medicinal products but also to (digital) MDs. Based on the submitted files from 2015 to 2021, the derogatory access was approved about 70% for medicinal products and 30% for MDs/procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><div>While fast-track processes appear widely used and understood for medicinal products, the different pathways available for MDs and procedures remain under-used and sometimes misunderstood. Whichever the product, the main limitation factor of approval was data quality and maturity, in concordance with reports on accelerated approvals from the FDA. The main challenge is to find the right balance between rapid access to innovation and patient safety, while addressing ethical challenges posed by new therapeutic approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20530,"journal":{"name":"Presse Medicale","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 104284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presse Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075549822500017X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To accelerate the availability of innovative healthcare technologies for patients with the potential for significant clinical benefits in a context of high unmet needs, derogatory programs have been elaborated. The aim of this paper is to describe the different pathways developed in France to accelerate access to innovation, efficiently handle uncertainties while controlling the risks for patients.

Methods

We first describe the different early and temporary accesses to innovation in France involving the HAS. Feedback on these pathways based on the decisions provided by the HAS up until June 2024, is summarised and discussed. Subsequent emphasis is placed on the challenges of the evaluation process.

Findings

French derogatory pathways for innovation distinguish between medicinal products, medical devices (MDs) and procedures, as well as the funding mechanism. Early funding is dedicated to MDs, in vitro diagnostic MDs and procedures. Later fast-track access is dedicated to medicinal products but also to (digital) MDs. Based on the submitted files from 2015 to 2021, the derogatory access was approved about 70% for medicinal products and 30% for MDs/procedures.

Conclusions and Relevance

While fast-track processes appear widely used and understood for medicinal products, the different pathways available for MDs and procedures remain under-used and sometimes misunderstood. Whichever the product, the main limitation factor of approval was data quality and maturity, in concordance with reports on accelerated approvals from the FDA. The main challenge is to find the right balance between rapid access to innovation and patient safety, while addressing ethical challenges posed by new therapeutic approaches.
法国对创新卫生技术的评价:尽早获得和供资
背景:为了加速创新医疗保健技术的可用性,在高度未满足需求的背景下,具有潜在的显著临床益处的患者,贬损计划已经详细阐述。本文的目的是描述在法国开发的不同途径,以加速获得创新,有效地处理不确定性,同时控制患者的风险。方法我们首先描述了法国涉及HAS的不同的早期和临时创新途径。在2024年6月之前,对这些途径的反馈进行总结和讨论,这些反馈基于HAS提供的决定。随后重点放在评价过程的挑战上。法国贬损创新途径区分了医药产品、医疗器械(MDs)和程序,以及资助机制。早期资金专门用于医学博士,体外诊断医学博士和程序。后来的快速通道专门用于药品,但也用于(数字)医学博士。根据2015年至2021年提交的文件,药品的贬损准入批准率约为70%,MDs/程序的贬损准入批准率为30%。结论和相关性虽然快速通道流程似乎被广泛使用并被理解为药品,但医学博士可用的不同途径和程序仍未得到充分利用,有时甚至被误解。无论哪种产品,批准的主要限制因素是数据质量和成熟度,这与FDA加速批准的报告一致。主要挑战是在快速获得创新和患者安全之间找到适当的平衡,同时解决新治疗方法带来的伦理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Presse Medicale
Presse Medicale 医学-医学:内科
自引率
3.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Seule revue médicale "généraliste" de haut niveau, La Presse Médicale est l''équivalent francophone des grandes revues anglosaxonnes de publication et de formation continue. A raison d''un numéro par mois, La Presse Médicale vous offre une double approche éditoriale : - des publications originales (articles originaux, revues systématiques, cas cliniques) soumises à double expertise, portant sur les avancées médicales les plus récentes ; - une partie orientée vers la FMC, vous propose une mise à jour permanente et de haut niveau de vos connaissances, sous forme de dossiers thématiques et de mises au point dans les principales spécialités médicales, pour vous aider à optimiser votre formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信