Revealing public attitudes toward ‘substituting plastic with bamboo’ in China: Sentiment and topic analyses using social media data

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jingsong Ji , Xiaoxiao Xu , Vivian W.Y. Tam , Yangzi Zhang
{"title":"Revealing public attitudes toward ‘substituting plastic with bamboo’ in China: Sentiment and topic analyses using social media data","authors":"Jingsong Ji ,&nbsp;Xiaoxiao Xu ,&nbsp;Vivian W.Y. Tam ,&nbsp;Yangzi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public attitudes play a critical role in the successful implementation of national policies. However, there is a scarcity of systematic research presenting the Chinese public's sentiments regarding the “substituting plastic with bamboo” policy. With the increasing use of social media platforms for expressing views on policies, this research employs web crawler technology to collect public data from TikTok, Bilibili, and Sina Weibo, and uses statistical analysis and text mining techniques for investigation. The findings indicate that public discourse is strongly influenced by the announcement of related national policies. Commonly identified keywords in the analysis include “plastic bag,” “cut,” “chopsticks,” “moldy,” “single use,” “garbage,” and “buy.” Sentiment analysis reveals that neutral sentiments account for more than one-third of all comments, with positive sentiments marginally outnumbering the negative ones. The negative sentiments predominantly express concerns about the quality and cost of bamboo wares, environmental repercussions, and policy implementation challenges. Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic analysis, six key topics were identified based on Coherence and Jensen-Shannon Divergence metrics: economic environmental impact, the feasibility of substitution, impact on daily life, utilization of bamboo wares, production challenges, and policy implications. This research concludes with several policy recommendations. The insights gained from this research can assist the Chinese government and bamboo ware manufacturers in understanding market dynamics and in crafting more effective policies and strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public attitudes play a critical role in the successful implementation of national policies. However, there is a scarcity of systematic research presenting the Chinese public's sentiments regarding the “substituting plastic with bamboo” policy. With the increasing use of social media platforms for expressing views on policies, this research employs web crawler technology to collect public data from TikTok, Bilibili, and Sina Weibo, and uses statistical analysis and text mining techniques for investigation. The findings indicate that public discourse is strongly influenced by the announcement of related national policies. Commonly identified keywords in the analysis include “plastic bag,” “cut,” “chopsticks,” “moldy,” “single use,” “garbage,” and “buy.” Sentiment analysis reveals that neutral sentiments account for more than one-third of all comments, with positive sentiments marginally outnumbering the negative ones. The negative sentiments predominantly express concerns about the quality and cost of bamboo wares, environmental repercussions, and policy implementation challenges. Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic analysis, six key topics were identified based on Coherence and Jensen-Shannon Divergence metrics: economic environmental impact, the feasibility of substitution, impact on daily life, utilization of bamboo wares, production challenges, and policy implications. This research concludes with several policy recommendations. The insights gained from this research can assist the Chinese government and bamboo ware manufacturers in understanding market dynamics and in crafting more effective policies and strategies.
揭示中国公众对“以竹代塑”的态度:基于社交媒体数据的情绪和话题分析
公众态度对国家政策的成功实施起着至关重要的作用。然而,对于“以塑代竹”政策,中国民众的情绪,却缺乏系统的研究。随着越来越多的社交媒体平台用于表达对政策的看法,本研究采用网络爬虫技术收集TikTok, Bilibili和新浪微博上的公共数据,并使用统计分析和文本挖掘技术进行调查。研究结果表明,公共话语受到相关国家政策公告的强烈影响。分析中常见的关键词包括“塑料袋”、“切割”、“筷子”、“发霉”、“一次性”、“垃圾”和“购买”。情绪分析显示,中性情绪占所有评论的三分之一以上,积极情绪略多于消极情绪。负面情绪主要表达了对竹制品质量和成本、环境影响和政策实施挑战的担忧。利用潜在狄利克雷分配主题分析,基于相干性和Jensen-Shannon散度指标确定了6个关键主题:经济环境影响、替代可行性、对日常生活的影响、竹制品利用、生产挑战和政策影响。这项研究总结了几项政策建议。从这项研究中获得的见解可以帮助中国政府和竹器制造商了解市场动态,制定更有效的政策和战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信