{"title":"Does New York State bail reform moderate the impact of pretrial detention on conviction rates?","authors":"Jingyi Hauck, Eunbyeor Sophie Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>As New York State (NYS) bail reform continues to instigate debates over its social impact, this study aims to examine 1) whether bail reform moderates the impact of pretrial detention on probability of conviction, and 2) whether such moderating effect differs by region between New York City (NYC) and non-New York City (non-NYC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using 2019 and 2022 arraignment data from New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, we employ the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method with moderation analysis to control for imbalances between released and detained groups within region and within arraignment charge severity. Weighted logistic regression is used to estimate average marginal effect for measuring moderating effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find significant moderating effect of bail reform in NYC where bail reform weakens the adverse effect of pretrial detention through a 15% reduction in probability of conviction. Our results also show that the moderating effect of bail reform does differ by region where NYC defendants benefit significantly more than non-NYC defendants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that although NYS bail reform is a state-level legislative change, its impact varies by regions. Our results also demonstrate that bail reform seems to be beneficial for defendants through a lowered probability of conviction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
As New York State (NYS) bail reform continues to instigate debates over its social impact, this study aims to examine 1) whether bail reform moderates the impact of pretrial detention on probability of conviction, and 2) whether such moderating effect differs by region between New York City (NYC) and non-New York City (non-NYC).
Methods
Using 2019 and 2022 arraignment data from New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, we employ the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method with moderation analysis to control for imbalances between released and detained groups within region and within arraignment charge severity. Weighted logistic regression is used to estimate average marginal effect for measuring moderating effect.
Results
We find significant moderating effect of bail reform in NYC where bail reform weakens the adverse effect of pretrial detention through a 15% reduction in probability of conviction. Our results also show that the moderating effect of bail reform does differ by region where NYC defendants benefit significantly more than non-NYC defendants.
Conclusions
This study suggests that although NYS bail reform is a state-level legislative change, its impact varies by regions. Our results also demonstrate that bail reform seems to be beneficial for defendants through a lowered probability of conviction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest.
Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.