Radioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de mama: análisis comparativo de la toxicidad de 2 esquemas de hipofraccionamiento

IF 0.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laura Vaya González, Clara Iglesias Melero, María Soledad Quesada Muñoz, María Domínguez Rodríguez, José Manuel Rico Pérez, Nuria Azahara Linares Mesa
{"title":"Radioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de mama: análisis comparativo de la toxicidad de 2 esquemas de hipofraccionamiento","authors":"Laura Vaya González,&nbsp;Clara Iglesias Melero,&nbsp;María Soledad Quesada Muñoz,&nbsp;María Domínguez Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Manuel Rico Pérez,&nbsp;Nuria Azahara Linares Mesa","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2025.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer has been given in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions for decades. Protracted schemes have proven as effective and safe as conventional. Schemes involving 5 fractions once a week are as safe as those involving one daily fraction for three weeks. We compared acute and late toxicity of two hypofractionated regimes.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-center observational study involving 100 unselected patients, treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with either 40 Gy/15 fr/3 weeks or 28,5 Gy/5 fr/5 weeks (1:1 ratio). Statistical tests used: Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>). Toxicity (assessed by physicians/nurses using RTOG/CTCAE Score at end of treatment, one month and six months later) was retrieved from patients notes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up: 16.6 months. Average age: 59 years. The comparison between the 15-session and 5-session groups revealed the following results: boost: 24% vs. 2%; lumpectomy: 62% vs. 92%; mastectomy 38% vs. 14%; lymphadenectomy 36% vs. 14%; RT to SCF + level III: 54% vs. 8%; acute skin toxicity 70% vs. 60%; acute odynophagia: 16% vs. 2%; late toxicity (induration, edema, deformity-distortion, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation) 30% vs. 52%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Odynophagia was more frequent in weekly treatments. Prophylactic nodal irradiation rates could be a confounding factor. A modest excess of G1 breast induration in 5 fractions schemes was detected. To summarize, both schemes are similar concerning acute and late toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158225000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer has been given in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions for decades. Protracted schemes have proven as effective and safe as conventional. Schemes involving 5 fractions once a week are as safe as those involving one daily fraction for three weeks. We compared acute and late toxicity of two hypofractionated regimes.

Material and methods

Retrospective single-center observational study involving 100 unselected patients, treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with either 40 Gy/15 fr/3 weeks or 28,5 Gy/5 fr/5 weeks (1:1 ratio). Statistical tests used: Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square (χ2). Toxicity (assessed by physicians/nurses using RTOG/CTCAE Score at end of treatment, one month and six months later) was retrieved from patients notes.

Results

Median follow-up: 16.6 months. Average age: 59 years. The comparison between the 15-session and 5-session groups revealed the following results: boost: 24% vs. 2%; lumpectomy: 62% vs. 92%; mastectomy 38% vs. 14%; lymphadenectomy 36% vs. 14%; RT to SCF + level III: 54% vs. 8%; acute skin toxicity 70% vs. 60%; acute odynophagia: 16% vs. 2%; late toxicity (induration, edema, deformity-distortion, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation) 30% vs. 52%.

Conclusion

Odynophagia was more frequent in weekly treatments. Prophylactic nodal irradiation rates could be a confounding factor. A modest excess of G1 breast induration in 5 fractions schemes was detected. To summarize, both schemes are similar concerning acute and late toxicity.
辅助放射治疗乳腺癌:2种低分馏方案的毒性比较分析
目的数十年来,乳腺癌辅助放疗(RT)的每日剂量为1.8-2 Gy。长期计划已被证明与传统计划一样有效和安全。每周5次的方案与连续三周每天1次的方案一样安全。我们比较了两种低分割方案的急性和晚期毒性。材料和方法回顾性单中心观察研究,纳入100例未选择的乳腺癌患者,接受辅助放疗,40 Gy/15 fr/3 周或28.5 Gy/5 fr/5 周(1:1比例)。统计检验:Mann-Whitney U和χ2 (χ2)。毒性(由医生/护士在治疗结束、1个月和6个月后使用RTOG/CTCAE评分评估)从患者记录中检索。中位随访时间:16.6 个月。平均年龄59岁 岁。15节课组和5节课组的对比结果如下:提升幅度分别为24%和2%;乳房肿瘤切除术:62% vs. 92%;乳房切除术38% vs. 14%;淋巴结切除术36% vs. 14%;RT至SCF + III级:54% vs. 8%;急性皮肤毒性70% vs 60%;急性缺血症:16% vs. 2%;晚期毒性(硬化、水肿、畸形-扭曲、毛细血管扩张、色素沉着)30% vs 52%。结论每周治疗中出现较多的厌食症。预防性淋巴结照射率可能是一个混杂因素。在5个分数方案中检测到G1乳房硬化的适度过量。总之,两种方案在急性和晚期毒性方面是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信