Thermal resilience to climate change of energy retrofit technologies for building envelope

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Giuseppe Aruta , Fabrizio Ascione , Teresa Iovane , Margherita Mastellone
{"title":"Thermal resilience to climate change of energy retrofit technologies for building envelope","authors":"Giuseppe Aruta ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Ascione ,&nbsp;Teresa Iovane ,&nbsp;Margherita Mastellone","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.136489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past 20 years, energy retrofit measures for buildings, such as thermal insulation and window replacement, were standard practices. To further enhance the energy performance of building envelopes, innovative technologies like double-skin façades, opaque ventilated façades, and green roofs are also available, fostering a positive interaction between buildings and the environment. The paper evaluates the resilience of building technologies in relation to climate evolution and warming, considering both general (chronic) overheating and (spot) extreme events. Energy performances of a reference office, applying traditional and innovative energy retrofit packages, are analyzed under historical, current, and future weather conditions across three locations. The research questions and novelty are whether both traditional and innovative energy retrofits remain effective under climatic evolution and how the effectiveness of traditional versus innovative building technologies changes. Regarding space-heating energy demand, both retrofits are equally effective and resilient. For space cooling, the innovative package proves more effective under moderate conditions. However, under extreme outdoor conditions, traditional thermal insulation technologies may be more effective than innovative technologies. Attention is required when indoor temperatures are free-floating, as excessive thermal protection can imply indoor overheating. Ultimately, the thinking approach for energy retrofit measures should focus on long-term effectiveness and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 136489"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225021310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, energy retrofit measures for buildings, such as thermal insulation and window replacement, were standard practices. To further enhance the energy performance of building envelopes, innovative technologies like double-skin façades, opaque ventilated façades, and green roofs are also available, fostering a positive interaction between buildings and the environment. The paper evaluates the resilience of building technologies in relation to climate evolution and warming, considering both general (chronic) overheating and (spot) extreme events. Energy performances of a reference office, applying traditional and innovative energy retrofit packages, are analyzed under historical, current, and future weather conditions across three locations. The research questions and novelty are whether both traditional and innovative energy retrofits remain effective under climatic evolution and how the effectiveness of traditional versus innovative building technologies changes. Regarding space-heating energy demand, both retrofits are equally effective and resilient. For space cooling, the innovative package proves more effective under moderate conditions. However, under extreme outdoor conditions, traditional thermal insulation technologies may be more effective than innovative technologies. Attention is required when indoor temperatures are free-floating, as excessive thermal protection can imply indoor overheating. Ultimately, the thinking approach for energy retrofit measures should focus on long-term effectiveness and resilience.
建筑围护结构节能改造技术对气候变化的热弹性
在过去的20年里,建筑物的能源改造措施,如隔热和更换窗户,是标准做法。为了进一步提高建筑围护结构的能源性能,还采用了双层幕墙、不透明通风幕墙和绿色屋顶等创新技术,促进了建筑与环境之间的良性互动。考虑到一般(慢性)过热和(现场)极端事件,本文评估了建筑技术与气候演变和变暖相关的弹性。在三个地点的历史、当前和未来天气条件下,应用传统和创新的能源改造包,对参考办公室的能源性能进行了分析。研究的问题和新颖性是传统和创新的能源改造是否在气候变化下仍然有效,以及传统与创新建筑技术的有效性如何变化。在空间供暖能源需求方面,这两种改造同样有效且具有弹性。对于空间冷却,创新的包被证明在中等条件下更有效。然而,在极端的室外条件下,传统的保温技术可能比创新的技术更有效。当室内温度自由浮动时,需要注意,因为过度的热保护可能意味着室内过热。最终,能源改造措施的思考方法应侧重于长期有效性和弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信