Assessing the effect of health labels on online food choices

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Anna Wang , José M. Grisolía , Ada H.Y. Ma , Juan de Dios Ortúzar
{"title":"Assessing the effect of health labels on online food choices","authors":"Anna Wang ,&nbsp;José M. Grisolía ,&nbsp;Ada H.Y. Ma ,&nbsp;Juan de Dios Ortúzar","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online takeaway platforms provide a convenient access to food and their importance has increased dramatically in the last years. Our research explores if and how food choices via takeaway apps change after individuals are informed about excessive calories, fats, carbohydrates, and salts. Our results have practical implications for public health and food choices. We designed an efficient stated choice experiment based on actual meals offered online in China and applied it in a Randomized Between-Subjects Design to a sample of 964 respondents across 10 large Chinese cities. We split the sample into two groups: exposed and not exposed to a colour-code, traffic light information system (TLS). Our analysis, using a Difference-in-Differences model and an Error Components Mixed Logit model, revealed that respondents exposed to nutrition information chose takeaway menus with less fat, salt and calories. However, the information did not affect the choice of tasty meals heavy in carbohydrates, as these are far too important in the typical Chinese diet. We also found that price, positive reviews, and delivery time were drivers of the respondents' food choices, but significantly less important than food preferences and tastiness. Regarding TLS, we confirmed that red (i.e. danger) had the most significant impact in dissuading customers from choosing unhealthy food (salt and fat). These findings are helpful in the design of public policies geared toward healthier food consumption habits in the population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 105565"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online takeaway platforms provide a convenient access to food and their importance has increased dramatically in the last years. Our research explores if and how food choices via takeaway apps change after individuals are informed about excessive calories, fats, carbohydrates, and salts. Our results have practical implications for public health and food choices. We designed an efficient stated choice experiment based on actual meals offered online in China and applied it in a Randomized Between-Subjects Design to a sample of 964 respondents across 10 large Chinese cities. We split the sample into two groups: exposed and not exposed to a colour-code, traffic light information system (TLS). Our analysis, using a Difference-in-Differences model and an Error Components Mixed Logit model, revealed that respondents exposed to nutrition information chose takeaway menus with less fat, salt and calories. However, the information did not affect the choice of tasty meals heavy in carbohydrates, as these are far too important in the typical Chinese diet. We also found that price, positive reviews, and delivery time were drivers of the respondents' food choices, but significantly less important than food preferences and tastiness. Regarding TLS, we confirmed that red (i.e. danger) had the most significant impact in dissuading customers from choosing unhealthy food (salt and fat). These findings are helpful in the design of public policies geared toward healthier food consumption habits in the population.
评估健康标签对网上食品选择的影响
在线外卖平台提供了方便的食物获取渠道,其重要性在过去几年中急剧增加。我们的研究探讨了在人们被告知过量的卡路里、脂肪、碳水化合物和盐后,通过外卖应用选择的食物是否以及如何改变。我们的研究结果对公众健康和食物选择具有实际意义。我们基于中国在线提供的实际膳食设计了一个有效的陈述选择实验,并将其应用于随机受试者之间设计,对中国10个大城市的964名受访者进行了抽样调查。我们将样本分成两组:接触和不接触颜色代码,交通灯信息系统(TLS)。我们的分析使用了差中之差模型和误差成分混合Logit模型,结果显示,接触到营养信息的受访者选择了脂肪、盐和卡路里更少的外卖菜单。然而,这些信息并没有影响人们选择富含碳水化合物的美味食物,因为碳水化合物在典型的中国饮食中太重要了。我们还发现,价格、正面评价和送货时间是受访者选择食物的驱动因素,但其重要性明显低于食物偏好和味道。关于TLS,我们确认红色(即危险)在劝阻顾客选择不健康食品(盐和脂肪)方面的影响最为显著。这些发现有助于制定公共政策,使人们养成更健康的食品消费习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信