Chloe Mellor , Rochelle Embling , Menna Price , Milena Rundle , Alexandra Meynier , Sophie Vinoy , Laura Wilkinson
{"title":"Energy density of snacking episodes and eating behaviour: A systematic review of experimental studies","authors":"Chloe Mellor , Rochelle Embling , Menna Price , Milena Rundle , Alexandra Meynier , Sophie Vinoy , Laura Wilkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Snacking episodes can be defined as food and drink that are consumed between mealtimes. Snacking episodes can differ greatly in nutrient and energy content, having the potential to influence diet quality and, in turn, health. This systematic review aimed to understand the impact that the energy density of snacking episodes has on eating behaviour outcomes. Objective outcome measures included ad libitum snack intake and daily energy intake, and subjective measures included self-assessed hunger and satisfaction. Eight databases were searched based on set inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify peer-reviewed experimental studies with adult populations. Across the ten eligible studies, seven assessed hunger, five assessed fullness, one assessed overall satiety, five assessed desire to eat/prospective food consumption, and eight assessed energy intake, ad libitum intake/compensation with respect to the impact of snacking episodes' energy density. The weight of the evidence suggested that the energy density of snacking episodes has little effect on eating behaviour outcomes, with limited evidence suggesting that higher energy density snacking episodes could result in higher satiety levels and influence fullness levels but only at specific time points. Risk of confound was high, including little control over volume and sensory characteristics across studies, particularly those reporting significant effects. Overall, this literature would benefit from using standardised snacking comparisons, to confidently identify the impacts of energy density for snacking episodes on eating behaviour outcomes. Findings could inform future studies that aim to understand the formulation of snacking episode considering energy density, to benefit diet quality whilst maintaining consumer satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 105557"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Snacking episodes can be defined as food and drink that are consumed between mealtimes. Snacking episodes can differ greatly in nutrient and energy content, having the potential to influence diet quality and, in turn, health. This systematic review aimed to understand the impact that the energy density of snacking episodes has on eating behaviour outcomes. Objective outcome measures included ad libitum snack intake and daily energy intake, and subjective measures included self-assessed hunger and satisfaction. Eight databases were searched based on set inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify peer-reviewed experimental studies with adult populations. Across the ten eligible studies, seven assessed hunger, five assessed fullness, one assessed overall satiety, five assessed desire to eat/prospective food consumption, and eight assessed energy intake, ad libitum intake/compensation with respect to the impact of snacking episodes' energy density. The weight of the evidence suggested that the energy density of snacking episodes has little effect on eating behaviour outcomes, with limited evidence suggesting that higher energy density snacking episodes could result in higher satiety levels and influence fullness levels but only at specific time points. Risk of confound was high, including little control over volume and sensory characteristics across studies, particularly those reporting significant effects. Overall, this literature would benefit from using standardised snacking comparisons, to confidently identify the impacts of energy density for snacking episodes on eating behaviour outcomes. Findings could inform future studies that aim to understand the formulation of snacking episode considering energy density, to benefit diet quality whilst maintaining consumer satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.