Disentangling the knowledge and abilities to be targeted in patients suffering from dissociation: Development and validation of the knowledge and abilities about dissociation scale (KADS)

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alexis Vancappel , Lyna Chami , Arnaud Leroy , Hala Kerbage , Wissam El-Hage
{"title":"Disentangling the knowledge and abilities to be targeted in patients suffering from dissociation: Development and validation of the knowledge and abilities about dissociation scale (KADS)","authors":"Alexis Vancappel ,&nbsp;Lyna Chami ,&nbsp;Arnaud Leroy ,&nbsp;Hala Kerbage ,&nbsp;Wissam El-Hage","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recently, Dissociation-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (DF-CBT) has emerged as a new field of research, showing promising results. However, there is a lack of theoretical conceptualization regarding how patients develop specific knowledge and abilities to manage dissociation during this therapy. The aim of this study is to identify the knowledge and abilities that should be targeted within DF-CBT to reduce dissociation and its functional impact by validating a scale to measure them: the Knowledge and Abilities about Dissociation Scale (KADS).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We recruited 515 participants online through social media. They completed several self-reported questionnaires, including the KADS, the Dissociation Questionnaire (DIS-Q), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), the Dissociative Beliefs Scale (DBS), and a visual analog scale measuring the functional impact of dissociation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four factors composing the KADS: (F1) the ability to stop dissociation, (F2) the ability to accept and identify alters, (F3) the ability to identify dissociation, and (F4) knowledge about dissociation. We found good internal consistency for F1 and F2, acceptable consistency for F3, and low consistency for F4. F1 was associated with lower levels of psychopathology, while results for F2 and F3 were mixed. In contrast, F4 was associated with higher levels of psychopathology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The KADS demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and can be used in clinical practice. It differentiates four dimensions that could be targeted in psychotherapy. However, the ability to accept and identify alters (F2) requires further investigation to determine its potential clinical relevance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749925000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, Dissociation-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (DF-CBT) has emerged as a new field of research, showing promising results. However, there is a lack of theoretical conceptualization regarding how patients develop specific knowledge and abilities to manage dissociation during this therapy. The aim of this study is to identify the knowledge and abilities that should be targeted within DF-CBT to reduce dissociation and its functional impact by validating a scale to measure them: the Knowledge and Abilities about Dissociation Scale (KADS).

Method

We recruited 515 participants online through social media. They completed several self-reported questionnaires, including the KADS, the Dissociation Questionnaire (DIS-Q), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), the Dissociative Beliefs Scale (DBS), and a visual analog scale measuring the functional impact of dissociation.

Results

We identified four factors composing the KADS: (F1) the ability to stop dissociation, (F2) the ability to accept and identify alters, (F3) the ability to identify dissociation, and (F4) knowledge about dissociation. We found good internal consistency for F1 and F2, acceptable consistency for F3, and low consistency for F4. F1 was associated with lower levels of psychopathology, while results for F2 and F3 were mixed. In contrast, F4 was associated with higher levels of psychopathology.

Conclusion

The KADS demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and can be used in clinical practice. It differentiates four dimensions that could be targeted in psychotherapy. However, the ability to accept and identify alters (F2) requires further investigation to determine its potential clinical relevance.
解离患者目标知识与能力的解离:解离量表知识与能力的开发与验证
近年来,以分离为重点的认知行为治疗(DF-CBT)作为一个新的研究领域出现,并显示出良好的结果。然而,关于患者如何在治疗过程中发展特定的知识和能力来管理分离,缺乏理论概念化。本研究的目的是通过验证一个测量量表:关于解离的知识和能力量表(KADS)来确定DF-CBT中应该针对的知识和能力,以减少解离及其功能影响。方法通过社交媒体在线招募515名参与者。他们完成了几份自我报告问卷,包括KADS、解离问卷(DIS-Q)、情绪调节困难量表(DERS)、国际创伤问卷(ITQ)、解离信念量表(DBS)和测量解离功能影响的视觉模拟量表。结果我们确定了构成KADS的四个因素:(F1)停止解离的能力,(F2)接受和识别改变的能力,(F3)识别解离的能力,(F4)解离知识。我们发现F1和F2内部一致性较好,F3内部一致性尚可,F4内部一致性较低。F1与较低的精神病理水平相关,而F2和F3的结果则是混合的。相反,F4与较高水平的精神病理相关。结论KADS具有良好的心理测量性能,可用于临床。它区分了四个维度,可以作为心理治疗的目标。然而,接受和识别改变(F2)的能力需要进一步研究以确定其潜在的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信