Improved fire severity prediction using pre-fire remote sensing and meteorological time series: Application to the French Mediterranean area

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Victor Penot , Thomas Opitz , François Pimont , Olivier Merlin
{"title":"Improved fire severity prediction using pre-fire remote sensing and meteorological time series: Application to the French Mediterranean area","authors":"Victor Penot ,&nbsp;Thomas Opitz ,&nbsp;François Pimont ,&nbsp;Olivier Merlin","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire severity, or how an environment is affected by fire, can be estimated over large areas using remotely sensed indices like the Relative Burnt Ratio (RBR). RBR predictions typically rely on data from a single date just before the fire. However, predicting RBR accurately in both time and space remains challenging. To improve RBR predictability, we developed new models using time series data spanning several months before the fire. These models use fuel proxies derived from optical remote sensing and meteorological data. We applied this approach to fires in the French Mediterranean area during the summers of 2016–2021. We used a Lagged Generalized Additive Model (LGAM) and a Functional Linear Model (FLM) to estimate the influence of variables up to several months before the fire on RBR. A GAM fed with immediate pre-fire predictors served as a benchmark. Training and prediction were conducted at the fire–land-cover spatial scale using a training dataset spatially independent of the test dataset. FLM achieved the best prediction accuracy on test data (R=0.68, RMSE=0.057), outperforming LGAM (R=0.60, RMSE=0.063) and the benchmark (R=0.52, RMSE=0.069). FLM accurately predicted the highest RBR values when the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index decreased faster than the average and when the Duff Moisture Code increased faster than the average over the 65 days before the fire. The 17% decrease in the RMSE of FLM predictions compared to GAM predictions shows that understanding fuel dynamics up to two months before a fire provides valuable information for ranking areas by fire severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"371 ","pages":"Article 110588"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325002084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire severity, or how an environment is affected by fire, can be estimated over large areas using remotely sensed indices like the Relative Burnt Ratio (RBR). RBR predictions typically rely on data from a single date just before the fire. However, predicting RBR accurately in both time and space remains challenging. To improve RBR predictability, we developed new models using time series data spanning several months before the fire. These models use fuel proxies derived from optical remote sensing and meteorological data. We applied this approach to fires in the French Mediterranean area during the summers of 2016–2021. We used a Lagged Generalized Additive Model (LGAM) and a Functional Linear Model (FLM) to estimate the influence of variables up to several months before the fire on RBR. A GAM fed with immediate pre-fire predictors served as a benchmark. Training and prediction were conducted at the fire–land-cover spatial scale using a training dataset spatially independent of the test dataset. FLM achieved the best prediction accuracy on test data (R=0.68, RMSE=0.057), outperforming LGAM (R=0.60, RMSE=0.063) and the benchmark (R=0.52, RMSE=0.069). FLM accurately predicted the highest RBR values when the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index decreased faster than the average and when the Duff Moisture Code increased faster than the average over the 65 days before the fire. The 17% decrease in the RMSE of FLM predictions compared to GAM predictions shows that understanding fuel dynamics up to two months before a fire provides valuable information for ranking areas by fire severity.
利用火灾前遥感和气象时间序列改进的火灾严重程度预测:在法国地中海地区的应用
火灾的严重程度,或环境如何受到火灾的影响,可以使用遥感指数,如相对燃烧比(RBR)来估计大面积的火灾。RBR预测通常依赖于火灾前一个日期的数据。然而,在时间和空间上准确预测RBR仍然具有挑战性。为了提高RBR的可预测性,我们使用火灾前几个月的时间序列数据开发了新的模型。这些模型使用来自光学遥感和气象数据的燃料代用物。我们将这种方法应用于法国地中海地区2016-2021年夏季的火灾。我们使用滞后广义加性模型(LGAM)和泛函线性模型(FLM)来估计火灾前几个月变量对RBR的影响。具有火灾前即时预测器的GAM可以作为基准。在空间尺度上使用独立于测试数据集的训练数据集进行训练和预测。FLM对测试数据的预测准确率最高(R=0.68, RMSE=0.057),优于LGAM (R=0.60, RMSE=0.063)和基准(R=0.52, RMSE=0.069)。在火灾发生前65 d内,当归一化植被指数下降速度快于平均值,Duff湿度代码增长速度快于平均值时,FLM准确预测了最高RBR值。与GAM预测相比,FLM预测的RMSE降低了17%,这表明在火灾发生前两个月了解燃料动态为根据火灾严重程度对地区进行排名提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信