{"title":"Minimum reporting requirements for platelet-rich plasma in biomaterial research","authors":"S. Amitha Banu , Khan Sharun","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining significant attention in regenerative medicine, offering an abundance of growth factors and bioactive molecules that promote tissue repair and healing. In biomaterial research, PRP is often incorporated into scaffolds to enhance their bioactivity, facilitating cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation for improved tissue regeneration. However, inconsistencies in outcomes and variability across studies hinder its clinical translation. These challenges are primarily attributed to the lack of standardized reporting criteria for PRP characterization, which limits reproducibility and cross-study comparisons. Accurate characterization of PRP is essential for understanding its biological activity and therapeutic potential. Key parameters include platelet, white blood cell, and red blood cell concentrations. Recent classification systems, such as those proposed by the ISTH Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology, emphasize the importance of these parameters in categorizing PRP types. Establishing minimal reporting requirements helps address variability in PRP studies, ensuring consistency and transparency in the methodology and results. By adopting these standards as mandatory reporting requirements, researchers can reduce variability, enhance the credibility of their findings, and facilitate the development of standardized protocols for PRP-based therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 214314"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950825001414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining significant attention in regenerative medicine, offering an abundance of growth factors and bioactive molecules that promote tissue repair and healing. In biomaterial research, PRP is often incorporated into scaffolds to enhance their bioactivity, facilitating cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation for improved tissue regeneration. However, inconsistencies in outcomes and variability across studies hinder its clinical translation. These challenges are primarily attributed to the lack of standardized reporting criteria for PRP characterization, which limits reproducibility and cross-study comparisons. Accurate characterization of PRP is essential for understanding its biological activity and therapeutic potential. Key parameters include platelet, white blood cell, and red blood cell concentrations. Recent classification systems, such as those proposed by the ISTH Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology, emphasize the importance of these parameters in categorizing PRP types. Establishing minimal reporting requirements helps address variability in PRP studies, ensuring consistency and transparency in the methodology and results. By adopting these standards as mandatory reporting requirements, researchers can reduce variability, enhance the credibility of their findings, and facilitate the development of standardized protocols for PRP-based therapies.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!