Comparative sustainability assessment of hybrid desalination systems for freshwater production

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Nadira Salsabila , Asifa Anwar , Haya Talib Shubbar , M. Imran Khan , Tareq Al-Ansari , Yusuf Bicer
{"title":"Comparative sustainability assessment of hybrid desalination systems for freshwater production","authors":"Nadira Salsabila ,&nbsp;Asifa Anwar ,&nbsp;Haya Talib Shubbar ,&nbsp;M. Imran Khan ,&nbsp;Tareq Al-Ansari ,&nbsp;Yusuf Bicer","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water scarcity is one of the most critical global challenges, with nearly 4 billion people affected by acute water shortages. Desalination has emerged as a key solution to meet the growing demand for freshwater, especially in arid regions. However, standalone conventional desalination technologies such as multi-stage flash (MSF) and reverse osmosis (RO) face challenges in terms of high energy consumption, low water recovery rates in some cases, and certain environmental impacts, which hybrid desalination systems can mitigate. Despite the growing interest in hybrid desalination technologies, there is a gap in their sustainability analysis, making it difficult to determine the most sustainable option for freshwater production. Therefore, this study conducts a comprehensive sustainability assessment of seven different hybrid desalination configurations with double-stage RO as the control. The analysis focuses on key indicators of sustainability, including energy efficiency, water recovery, environmental impacts, and social acceptance of the produced freshwater. The results reveal that the RO system, when combined with multi-effect distillation (MED), had a global sustainability index (GSI) of 83 %, which is the most sustainable configuration, outperforming RO-RO (GSI of 75 %). In contrast, the MSF-RO system ranks the lowest with a GSI of 24 %, due to its high energy consumption and carbon emissions. The study highlights the potential of hybrid systems, particularly RO-MED, to address water scarcity more sustainably. These findings offer practical guidance for policymakers and industry stakeholders in selecting desalination technologies that balance water security, energy efficiency, and environmental impact. Future research should explore integrating renewable energy sources into hybrid systems to further reduce environmental impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100440"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water scarcity is one of the most critical global challenges, with nearly 4 billion people affected by acute water shortages. Desalination has emerged as a key solution to meet the growing demand for freshwater, especially in arid regions. However, standalone conventional desalination technologies such as multi-stage flash (MSF) and reverse osmosis (RO) face challenges in terms of high energy consumption, low water recovery rates in some cases, and certain environmental impacts, which hybrid desalination systems can mitigate. Despite the growing interest in hybrid desalination technologies, there is a gap in their sustainability analysis, making it difficult to determine the most sustainable option for freshwater production. Therefore, this study conducts a comprehensive sustainability assessment of seven different hybrid desalination configurations with double-stage RO as the control. The analysis focuses on key indicators of sustainability, including energy efficiency, water recovery, environmental impacts, and social acceptance of the produced freshwater. The results reveal that the RO system, when combined with multi-effect distillation (MED), had a global sustainability index (GSI) of 83 %, which is the most sustainable configuration, outperforming RO-RO (GSI of 75 %). In contrast, the MSF-RO system ranks the lowest with a GSI of 24 %, due to its high energy consumption and carbon emissions. The study highlights the potential of hybrid systems, particularly RO-MED, to address water scarcity more sustainably. These findings offer practical guidance for policymakers and industry stakeholders in selecting desalination technologies that balance water security, energy efficiency, and environmental impact. Future research should explore integrating renewable energy sources into hybrid systems to further reduce environmental impacts.

Abstract Image

淡水生产混合海水淡化系统的可持续性比较评价
水资源短缺是全球最严峻的挑战之一,近40亿人受到严重缺水的影响。海水淡化已成为满足日益增长的淡水需求的关键解决方案,特别是在干旱地区。然而,独立的传统海水淡化技术,如多级闪蒸(MSF)和反渗透(RO),在某些情况下面临着高能耗、低水回收率和某些环境影响方面的挑战,而混合海水淡化系统可以减轻这些挑战。尽管人们对混合海水淡化技术越来越感兴趣,但在可持续性分析方面存在差距,因此难以确定淡水生产的最可持续选择。因此,本研究以双级RO为对照,对7种不同的混合海水淡化配置进行了综合可持续性评估。分析的重点是可持续性的关键指标,包括能源效率、水回收、环境影响和生产的淡水的社会接受度。结果表明,当与多效蒸馏(MED)相结合时,RO系统的全球可持续性指数(GSI)为83%,是最具可持续性的配置,优于RO-RO (GSI为75%)。相比之下,MSF-RO系统排名最低,GSI为24%,由于其高能耗和碳排放。该研究强调了混合系统的潜力,特别是RO-MED,以更可持续的方式解决水资源短缺问题。这些发现为政策制定者和行业利益相关者选择能够平衡水安全、能源效率和环境影响的海水淡化技术提供了实用指导。未来的研究应探索将可再生能源整合到混合系统中,以进一步减少对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信