Agent-based modeling of residential photovoltaic adoption and diffusion: Implications for energy policy design

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Nan Zhang , Jianxiong Xu , Tianpei Tang , Meining Yuan , Bon-Gang Hwang
{"title":"Agent-based modeling of residential photovoltaic adoption and diffusion: Implications for energy policy design","authors":"Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianxiong Xu ,&nbsp;Tianpei Tang ,&nbsp;Meining Yuan ,&nbsp;Bon-Gang Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential Photovoltaics (RPV) systems, a type of building-integrated photovoltaics for residential buildings, play a significant role in energy transformation as residential buildings account for approximately 38 % of total electricity consumption. Countries worldwide employ different energy policies to promote RPV adoption, such as Feed-in Tariff (FIT), Net Billing (NetB), and Net Metering (NetM). However, existing research often neglects the impact of these policies on consumers' post-installation energy behaviors, such as the \"rebound effect\" on energy usage, which may counteract the policy's original design. Additionally, there currently is a lack of a systematic approach for choosing suitable energy policies under different scenarios and determining optimal policy parameters in RPV policy analysis. This study implements a simulation-optimization approach based on survey data to address the aforementioned issues by innovatively incorporating energy usage behaviors into the analysis. Using Singapore as the Base Case, different scenarios are synthesized to simulate RPV adoption environments in other representative districts. This study identifies valuable policy modification patterns that can assist policymakers in designing optimal energy policies. Furthermore, the methodology can be applied globally to other renewable energy technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500075X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential Photovoltaics (RPV) systems, a type of building-integrated photovoltaics for residential buildings, play a significant role in energy transformation as residential buildings account for approximately 38 % of total electricity consumption. Countries worldwide employ different energy policies to promote RPV adoption, such as Feed-in Tariff (FIT), Net Billing (NetB), and Net Metering (NetM). However, existing research often neglects the impact of these policies on consumers' post-installation energy behaviors, such as the "rebound effect" on energy usage, which may counteract the policy's original design. Additionally, there currently is a lack of a systematic approach for choosing suitable energy policies under different scenarios and determining optimal policy parameters in RPV policy analysis. This study implements a simulation-optimization approach based on survey data to address the aforementioned issues by innovatively incorporating energy usage behaviors into the analysis. Using Singapore as the Base Case, different scenarios are synthesized to simulate RPV adoption environments in other representative districts. This study identifies valuable policy modification patterns that can assist policymakers in designing optimal energy policies. Furthermore, the methodology can be applied globally to other renewable energy technologies.
基于主体的住宅光伏采用和扩散模型:对能源政策设计的启示
住宅光伏(RPV)系统是一种用于住宅建筑的建筑集成光伏系统,在能源转型中发挥着重要作用,因为住宅建筑约占总用电量的38%。世界各国采用不同的能源政策来促进RPV的采用,如上网电价(FIT)、净计费(NetB)和净计量(NetM)。然而,现有的研究往往忽略了这些政策对消费者安装后能源行为的影响,如对能源使用的“反弹效应”,这可能会抵消政策的原始设计。此外,在RPV政策分析中,目前还缺乏在不同情景下选择合适的能源政策和确定最佳政策参数的系统方法。本研究采用基于调查数据的模拟优化方法,创新性地将能源使用行为纳入分析,以解决上述问题。以新加坡为基本案例,综合不同场景,模拟其他代表性地区的RPV采用环境。这项研究确定了有价值的政策修改模式,可以帮助决策者设计最佳的能源政策。此外,该方法可以在全球范围内应用于其他可再生能源技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信