Jing Ling Tay, Ling Zhang, Jie Sang, Keng Boon Ong
{"title":"Unexpected deaths within psychiatric setting: A scoping review","authors":"Jing Ling Tay, Ling Zhang, Jie Sang, Keng Boon Ong","doi":"10.1016/j.apnu.2025.151878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Unexpected deaths have been associated with a variety of factors within the inpatient psychiatric setting.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This scoping review aims to evaluate the contributing/risk factors and preventive strategies of unexpected deaths.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study is guided by the PRISMA extension for scoping review and the PRISMA 2020 statement. Six databases were searched from database inception to 18 December 2023, using the keywords: death* or mortality or autopsy AND (mental health) or psychiat* AND inpatient*. Studies published in English that explored the causes, contributing factors, risk factors, and preventive strategies of unexpected death within the inpatient psychiatric settings were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven articles were included. The articles explored contributing factors (100 %, n = 27), and strategies (59.3 %, n = 16) surrounding unexpected deaths within inpatient psychiatry setting. Studies attributed the causes to (1) medical conditions, (2) restraints, (3) asphyxia, and (4) catatonia or extreme agitation. Studies, mostly case reports, described deaths in those who utilised (5) antipsychotics but greater quality studies, such as case controls denied this association. Corresponding preventive strategies included, (1) medical assessment and treatment (especially cardiovascular disorders and their related risk factors), collaboration with medical physicians, staff training, staffing (increasing physician numbers), (2) usage of better alternatives like counselling, rapid tranquilisation, usage of restraints cautiously as a last resort with thorough observation, (3) risk assessment, training, (4) prompt treatment of catatonia and, (5) simplification of antipsychotic regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>More good quality studies are required to examine this controversial topic. An evidence-based understanding of this important topic can save lives in psychiatry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55466,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 151878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883941725000494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Unexpected deaths have been associated with a variety of factors within the inpatient psychiatric setting.
Aims
This scoping review aims to evaluate the contributing/risk factors and preventive strategies of unexpected deaths.
Methods
This study is guided by the PRISMA extension for scoping review and the PRISMA 2020 statement. Six databases were searched from database inception to 18 December 2023, using the keywords: death* or mortality or autopsy AND (mental health) or psychiat* AND inpatient*. Studies published in English that explored the causes, contributing factors, risk factors, and preventive strategies of unexpected death within the inpatient psychiatric settings were included.
Results
Twenty-seven articles were included. The articles explored contributing factors (100 %, n = 27), and strategies (59.3 %, n = 16) surrounding unexpected deaths within inpatient psychiatry setting. Studies attributed the causes to (1) medical conditions, (2) restraints, (3) asphyxia, and (4) catatonia or extreme agitation. Studies, mostly case reports, described deaths in those who utilised (5) antipsychotics but greater quality studies, such as case controls denied this association. Corresponding preventive strategies included, (1) medical assessment and treatment (especially cardiovascular disorders and their related risk factors), collaboration with medical physicians, staff training, staffing (increasing physician numbers), (2) usage of better alternatives like counselling, rapid tranquilisation, usage of restraints cautiously as a last resort with thorough observation, (3) risk assessment, training, (4) prompt treatment of catatonia and, (5) simplification of antipsychotic regimen.
Conclusion
More good quality studies are required to examine this controversial topic. An evidence-based understanding of this important topic can save lives in psychiatry.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing disseminates original, peer-reviewed research that is of interest to psychiatric and mental health care nurses. The field is considered in its broadest perspective, including theory, practice and research applications related to all ages, special populations, settings, and interdisciplinary collaborations in both the public and private sectors. Through critical study, expositions, and review of practice, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing is a medium for clinical scholarship to provide theoretical linkages among diverse areas of practice.