Time to reappraise the antibiotic treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: data from the experimental model.

C García-de-la-Mària,O Gasch,M A Cañas,J García-González,F Marco,M Hernández-Meneses,E Quintana,J Ambrosioni,C Falces,J M Tolosana,B Vidal,J M Pericas,A Perissinotti,J Llopis,A Moreno,G Cuervo,J M Miró,
{"title":"Time to reappraise the antibiotic treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: data from the experimental model.","authors":"C García-de-la-Mària,O Gasch,M A Cañas,J García-González,F Marco,M Hernández-Meneses,E Quintana,J Ambrosioni,C Falces,J M Tolosana,B Vidal,J M Pericas,A Perissinotti,J Llopis,A Moreno,G Cuervo,J M Miró,","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nTraditional treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) native valve endocarditis is based on cloxacillin/cefazolin monotherapy. Antibiotics with high activity against MSSA such as ceftaroline and daptomycin have been marketed last years, but there are no clinical trials evaluating them as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with MSSA endocarditis.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo compare the efficacy of cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin monotherapies and daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams in a rabbit model of MSSA endocarditis.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nEndocarditis was induced in rabbits using two strains of MSSA. After 24h of infection, they received human-like doses of cloxacillin, ceftaroline or daptomycin or combinations of daptomycin plus either cloxacillin or ceftaroline. Isolates recovered from vegetation, spleen and kidney were retested for daptomycin non-susceptibility (DNS) post-treatment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMSSA vancomycin MIC did not influence the efficacy of any antibiotic treatment. Cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin had similar activity (25-50%) in sterilizing vegetations. However, 13% of rabbits treated with daptomycin developed DNS. The addition of daptomycin to cloxacillin or ceftaroline was synergistic and bactericidal, showing significantly more activity and higher rates of sterile vegetations (≥90%) than any monotherapy Combinations also showed better activity in spleens and kidneys compared with daptomycin monotherapy and prevented the development of DNS in all tissues. There were no differences between the two daptomycin combinations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn the MSSA experimental endocarditis model, daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams had significantly better activity than either their monotherapies in sterilizing valve vegetations and preventing DNS development. These findings support their use in clinical practice and to perform clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Traditional treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) native valve endocarditis is based on cloxacillin/cefazolin monotherapy. Antibiotics with high activity against MSSA such as ceftaroline and daptomycin have been marketed last years, but there are no clinical trials evaluating them as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with MSSA endocarditis. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin monotherapies and daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams in a rabbit model of MSSA endocarditis. METHODS Endocarditis was induced in rabbits using two strains of MSSA. After 24h of infection, they received human-like doses of cloxacillin, ceftaroline or daptomycin or combinations of daptomycin plus either cloxacillin or ceftaroline. Isolates recovered from vegetation, spleen and kidney were retested for daptomycin non-susceptibility (DNS) post-treatment. RESULTS MSSA vancomycin MIC did not influence the efficacy of any antibiotic treatment. Cloxacillin, ceftaroline and daptomycin had similar activity (25-50%) in sterilizing vegetations. However, 13% of rabbits treated with daptomycin developed DNS. The addition of daptomycin to cloxacillin or ceftaroline was synergistic and bactericidal, showing significantly more activity and higher rates of sterile vegetations (≥90%) than any monotherapy Combinations also showed better activity in spleens and kidneys compared with daptomycin monotherapy and prevented the development of DNS in all tissues. There were no differences between the two daptomycin combinations. CONCLUSIONS In the MSSA experimental endocarditis model, daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams had significantly better activity than either their monotherapies in sterilizing valve vegetations and preventing DNS development. These findings support their use in clinical practice and to perform clinical trials.
是时候重新评估甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染性心内膜炎的抗生素治疗了:来自实验模型的数据。
背景甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)原生心内膜炎的传统治疗是基于氯西林/头孢唑林单药治疗。抗MSSA高活性的抗生素,如头孢他林和达托霉素,已经在去年上市,但没有临床试验评估它们是单独治疗还是联合治疗MSSA心内膜炎。目的比较氯西林、头孢他林和达托霉素单药治疗和达托霉素联合β -内酰胺治疗兔MSSA心内膜炎的疗效。方法用2株MSSA诱导兔心内膜炎。感染24小时后,他们接受了类似人类剂量的氯西林、头孢他林或达托霉素,或达托霉素与氯西林或头孢他林的组合。从植物、脾脏和肾脏中回收的分离株在处理后重新检测达托霉素不敏感性(DNS)。结果smssa万古霉素MIC对所有抗生素治疗均无影响。氯西林、头孢他林和达托霉素对植被的杀菌活性相似(25-50%)。然而,达托霉素治疗的家兔中有13%出现DNS。达托霉素与氯西林或头孢他林联用具有增效和杀菌作用,其活性和无菌植被率(≥90%)明显高于任何单一治疗组合,在脾脏和肾脏中的活性也优于达托霉素单药治疗,并能阻止所有组织中DNS的发展。两种达托霉素组合间无差异。结论在MSSA实验性心内膜炎模型中,达托霉素联合β -内酰胺类药物对瓣膜植被的杀菌作用和对DNS的预防作用明显优于单用。这些发现支持了它们在临床实践和临床试验中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信