Sadiye Kosar, Amr Mustafa Abdelrahman, Oguz Orhun Teber, Hale Ozgun, Mustafa Evren Ersahin
{"title":"Impact of ultrasonication on sludge characteristics: Aerobic granular sludge versus waste activated sludge","authors":"Sadiye Kosar, Amr Mustafa Abdelrahman, Oguz Orhun Teber, Hale Ozgun, Mustafa Evren Ersahin","doi":"10.1016/j.ces.2025.121813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aerobic granular sludge (AGS) process is a promising wastewater treatment technology that is considered as an alternative to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process. Due to poor hydrolysis, sludge produced by AGS processes has low digestibility resulting in a decrease in energy recovery. Therefore, pretreatment methods such as ultrasonication, can be used to accelerate hydrolysis, and improve solubilization and anaerobic digestibility. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ultrasonication pretreatment on AGS in comparison to waste activated sludge (WAS). Two different intensities (50 W and 100 W) were applied to AGS and WAS and the release of organic compounds, phosphorus, ammonium, and heavy metals were to the supernatant were observed. Volatile fatty acids and proteins were the most abundant organic compounds released from AGS and WAS samples, respectively. Phosphorus release in AGS (5.68 ± 1.14 %) was lower than WAS (10.48 ± 0.23 %) at 100 W ultrasonication intensity. Similarly, release of ammonium in AGS (10.30 ± 0.03 %) was less than WAS (14.05 ± 0.01 %). Release of heavy metals showed a similar trend for both sludge samples, increasing with higher ultrasonication intensity. This correlation has been confirmed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. Ultrasonication pretreatment improved the sludge disintegration more in AGS than WAS which can lead to enhancement of AGS digestibility.","PeriodicalId":271,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.121813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aerobic granular sludge (AGS) process is a promising wastewater treatment technology that is considered as an alternative to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process. Due to poor hydrolysis, sludge produced by AGS processes has low digestibility resulting in a decrease in energy recovery. Therefore, pretreatment methods such as ultrasonication, can be used to accelerate hydrolysis, and improve solubilization and anaerobic digestibility. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ultrasonication pretreatment on AGS in comparison to waste activated sludge (WAS). Two different intensities (50 W and 100 W) were applied to AGS and WAS and the release of organic compounds, phosphorus, ammonium, and heavy metals were to the supernatant were observed. Volatile fatty acids and proteins were the most abundant organic compounds released from AGS and WAS samples, respectively. Phosphorus release in AGS (5.68 ± 1.14 %) was lower than WAS (10.48 ± 0.23 %) at 100 W ultrasonication intensity. Similarly, release of ammonium in AGS (10.30 ± 0.03 %) was less than WAS (14.05 ± 0.01 %). Release of heavy metals showed a similar trend for both sludge samples, increasing with higher ultrasonication intensity. This correlation has been confirmed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. Ultrasonication pretreatment improved the sludge disintegration more in AGS than WAS which can lead to enhancement of AGS digestibility.
期刊介绍:
Chemical engineering enables the transformation of natural resources and energy into useful products for society. It draws on and applies natural sciences, mathematics and economics, and has developed fundamental engineering science that underpins the discipline.
Chemical Engineering Science (CES) has been publishing papers on the fundamentals of chemical engineering since 1951. CES is the platform where the most significant advances in the discipline have ever since been published. Chemical Engineering Science has accompanied and sustained chemical engineering through its development into the vibrant and broad scientific discipline it is today.