Pesticides residues in pet food: A market-based study on prevalence and toxicological implications

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ana Macías-Montes , Octavio P. Luzardo , Annalisa Zaccaroni , Andrea Acosta-Dacal
{"title":"Pesticides residues in pet food: A market-based study on prevalence and toxicological implications","authors":"Ana Macías-Montes ,&nbsp;Octavio P. Luzardo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Zaccaroni ,&nbsp;Andrea Acosta-Dacal","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pesticide residues in pet food pose potential risks to animal health, yet their occurrence and dietary exposure in companion animals remain largely unexplored. This study analyzed 83 commercial dry pet food products (43 for dogs and 40 for cats) from the Spanish market to assess pesticide contamination and associated toxicological risks. A total of 51 pesticides were detected, predominantly fungicides (47 %) and insecticides (37 %), with 37.25 % of them banned in the European Union. Pesticide residues were significantly more prevalent in pet food containing vegetable ingredients (p = 0.041). Although pesticide residues were detected more frequently in dog food than in cat food (p &lt; 0.05), total pesticide concentrations did not significantly differ between species. The estimated daily intake (EDI), calculated according to manufacturer-recommended feeding rates, revealed significant differences in exposure levels between dogs and cats for specific compounds. However, cumulative exposure assessments through the Hazard Index (HI) indicated that all pesticide groups remained below the risk threshold (HI &lt; 1), with a worst-case scenario of 0.32. Despite the frequent detection of non-approved pesticides and regulatory concerns, our findings indicate that chronic dietary exposure to these pesticide residues in pet food is unlikely to pose an immediate toxicological risk, based on calculations using current regulatory thresholds, which are established for individual compounds. However, the long-term effects of chronic low-dose exposure to pesticide mixtures remain uncertain and require further investigation. The absence of specific maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pet food underscores the need for stricter regulations and systematic monitoring to ensure long-term safety. To our knowledge, this is one of the first comprehensive investigations assessing both pesticide prevalence and potential dietary exposure in companion animals, highlighting the urgent need for improved regulatory frameworks to address the presence of non-approved pesticides in pet food.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 126399"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125007729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pesticide residues in pet food pose potential risks to animal health, yet their occurrence and dietary exposure in companion animals remain largely unexplored. This study analyzed 83 commercial dry pet food products (43 for dogs and 40 for cats) from the Spanish market to assess pesticide contamination and associated toxicological risks. A total of 51 pesticides were detected, predominantly fungicides (47 %) and insecticides (37 %), with 37.25 % of them banned in the European Union. Pesticide residues were significantly more prevalent in pet food containing vegetable ingredients (p = 0.041). Although pesticide residues were detected more frequently in dog food than in cat food (p < 0.05), total pesticide concentrations did not significantly differ between species. The estimated daily intake (EDI), calculated according to manufacturer-recommended feeding rates, revealed significant differences in exposure levels between dogs and cats for specific compounds. However, cumulative exposure assessments through the Hazard Index (HI) indicated that all pesticide groups remained below the risk threshold (HI < 1), with a worst-case scenario of 0.32. Despite the frequent detection of non-approved pesticides and regulatory concerns, our findings indicate that chronic dietary exposure to these pesticide residues in pet food is unlikely to pose an immediate toxicological risk, based on calculations using current regulatory thresholds, which are established for individual compounds. However, the long-term effects of chronic low-dose exposure to pesticide mixtures remain uncertain and require further investigation. The absence of specific maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pet food underscores the need for stricter regulations and systematic monitoring to ensure long-term safety. To our knowledge, this is one of the first comprehensive investigations assessing both pesticide prevalence and potential dietary exposure in companion animals, highlighting the urgent need for improved regulatory frameworks to address the presence of non-approved pesticides in pet food.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

宠物食品中农药残留:流行率和毒理学意义的市场研究
宠物食品中的农药残留对动物健康构成潜在风险,但它们在伴侣动物中的发生情况和饮食暴露程度在很大程度上仍未得到研究。本研究分析了西班牙市场上83种商业干宠物食品(43种用于狗,40种用于猫),以评估农药污染和相关的毒理学风险。共检出51种农药,以杀菌剂(47%)和杀虫剂(37%)为主,其中37.25%为欧盟禁用农药。农药残留在含有蔬菜成分的宠物食品中更为普遍(p = 0.041)。尽管在狗粮中检测到农药残留的频率高于猫粮(p <;0.05),总农药浓度在种间差异不显著。根据制造商推荐的喂养率计算的估计每日摄入量(EDI)显示,狗和猫对特定化合物的暴露水平存在显着差异。然而,通过危害指数(HI)进行的累积暴露评估表明,所有农药组均低于风险阈值(HI <;1),最坏情况为0.32。尽管经常检测到未经批准的农药和监管方面的担忧,但我们的研究结果表明,基于当前针对单个化合物建立的监管阈值的计算,长期暴露于宠物食品中的这些农药残留不太可能造成立即的毒理学风险。然而,长期低剂量暴露于混合农药的长期影响仍不确定,需要进一步调查。宠物食品没有具体的最大残留限量(MRLs),这强调了需要更严格的法规和系统的监测,以确保长期安全。据我们所知,这是首次全面评估伴侣动物中农药流行率和潜在饮食暴露的调查之一,强调了改善监管框架以解决宠物食品中未经批准的农药存在的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信