Meanings and values of the craft market: An integrated perspective through service‐dominant logic

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Antea Gambicorti
{"title":"Meanings and values of the craft market: An integrated perspective through service‐dominant logic","authors":"Antea Gambicorti","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era of increasing digitalization, automation and fast production, craft has experienced a significant revival. Producers and consumers, by interacting at individual, dyadic and group levels, influence the craft market with positive and negative connotations. This generates a complex and dynamic environment, where multiple meanings and values intersect. To fully understand this environment, it is essential to integrate the perspectives of both producers and consumers, considering their diverse viewpoints and levels of engagement. Using Service‐Dominant Logic (S‐D Logic) as a theoretical framework, this paper reviews studies on craft through a multi‐level lens, identifying resources applied by producers and consumers at individual and community levels. These resources interact with institutions generating a complex set of meanings and values across micro, meso and macro levels. Key contrasts arise from these interactions, suggesting areas for future research. These include (a) producers’ affective commitment and personal well‐being versus contemporary market dynamics and economic rewards; (b) authenticity, care and custodianship, opposition to the mass market versus innovation and creativity; (c) collaborative market value, care and custodianship versus creativity and innovation of community members; (d) opposition to mass market, care and custodianship and the risk of craft‐washing. These findings provide a new conceptualization of the craft market by holistically and dynamically integrating producers' and consumers' literature. Furthermore, they offer valuable insights for producers, policymakers and institutions on the importance of considering multiple perspectives when dealing with the opportunities and challenges of this market.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an era of increasing digitalization, automation and fast production, craft has experienced a significant revival. Producers and consumers, by interacting at individual, dyadic and group levels, influence the craft market with positive and negative connotations. This generates a complex and dynamic environment, where multiple meanings and values intersect. To fully understand this environment, it is essential to integrate the perspectives of both producers and consumers, considering their diverse viewpoints and levels of engagement. Using Service‐Dominant Logic (S‐D Logic) as a theoretical framework, this paper reviews studies on craft through a multi‐level lens, identifying resources applied by producers and consumers at individual and community levels. These resources interact with institutions generating a complex set of meanings and values across micro, meso and macro levels. Key contrasts arise from these interactions, suggesting areas for future research. These include (a) producers’ affective commitment and personal well‐being versus contemporary market dynamics and economic rewards; (b) authenticity, care and custodianship, opposition to the mass market versus innovation and creativity; (c) collaborative market value, care and custodianship versus creativity and innovation of community members; (d) opposition to mass market, care and custodianship and the risk of craft‐washing. These findings provide a new conceptualization of the craft market by holistically and dynamically integrating producers' and consumers' literature. Furthermore, they offer valuable insights for producers, policymakers and institutions on the importance of considering multiple perspectives when dealing with the opportunities and challenges of this market.
手工艺市场的意义与价值:服务主导逻辑下的整合视角
在一个日益数字化、自动化和快速生产的时代,工艺经历了重大的复兴。生产者和消费者在个人、群体和群体层面上相互作用,对手工艺品市场产生积极和消极的影响。这就产生了一个复杂而动态的环境,多种意义和价值在其中交叉。为了充分理解这种环境,我们必须整合生产者和消费者的观点,考虑到他们的不同观点和参与程度。本文以服务主导逻辑(S - D逻辑)为理论框架,通过多层次视角回顾了工艺研究,确定了生产者和消费者在个人和社区层面应用的资源。这些资源与机构相互作用,在微观、中观和宏观层面上产生一系列复杂的意义和价值。这些相互作用产生了关键的对比,表明了未来研究的领域。这些包括(a)生产者的情感承诺和个人福祉与当代市场动态和经济回报;(b)真实性、关怀和管理,反对大众市场反对创新和创造;(c)协作市场价值、关怀和监护与社区成员的创造和创新;(d)反对大众市场、护理和保管以及手工清洗的风险。这些发现提供了一个新的概念,通过整体和动态整合生产者和消费者的文献工艺品市场。此外,它们还为生产商、政策制定者和机构提供了宝贵的见解,说明在应对这个市场的机遇和挑战时,考虑多角度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信