Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China: The Systemic and Targeted Perspectives

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chunhua Peng, Yanhui Wang, Junwu Dong, Chong Huang, Mengqin Yang
{"title":"Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China: The Systemic and Targeted Perspectives","authors":"Chunhua Peng, Yanhui Wang, Junwu Dong, Chong Huang, Mengqin Yang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on precisely identifying ecological restoration priorities within territorial spaces, aiming to safeguard ecological security and accelerate the implementation of differentiated restoration strategies. An innovative “area‐to‐point” framework is developed by integrating systematic ecological conservation and targeted restoration perspectives to accurately determine the priorities of ecological restoration work in territorial space. Taking the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) as a case study, a dual—evaluation method combining the ecosystem service importance index and the ecological problem index is adopted to quantitatively identify the restoration “areas.” Then, from the targeted restoration perspective, the ecological security pattern construction method is applied to identify the restoration “points.” Finally, spatial overlay techniques are utilized to determine the restoration priorities and formulate strategies for different intervention levels. The results convincingly demonstrate the validity and practicality of the proposed framework. A total of 300.63 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> of ecological restoration areas are identified, categorized into three priority levels: Level I (75.69 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), Level II (88.94 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), and Level III (136.00 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>). These areas are primarily located along critical ecological corridors in the northwestern and northern parts of TGRA. Although these areas exhibit high ecological value, some face significant ecological challenges, with land use predominantly consisting of arable and forestland. The study recommends comprehensive improvements in arable land management, artificial afforestation, greening construction, and enhanced ecological environment monitoring to prevent the loss of ecological land. The findings not only provide scientific guidance for ecological restoration in TGRA but also offer new insights for ecological restoration research in other regions.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on precisely identifying ecological restoration priorities within territorial spaces, aiming to safeguard ecological security and accelerate the implementation of differentiated restoration strategies. An innovative “area‐to‐point” framework is developed by integrating systematic ecological conservation and targeted restoration perspectives to accurately determine the priorities of ecological restoration work in territorial space. Taking the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) as a case study, a dual—evaluation method combining the ecosystem service importance index and the ecological problem index is adopted to quantitatively identify the restoration “areas.” Then, from the targeted restoration perspective, the ecological security pattern construction method is applied to identify the restoration “points.” Finally, spatial overlay techniques are utilized to determine the restoration priorities and formulate strategies for different intervention levels. The results convincingly demonstrate the validity and practicality of the proposed framework. A total of 300.63 km2 of ecological restoration areas are identified, categorized into three priority levels: Level I (75.69 km2), Level II (88.94 km2), and Level III (136.00 km2). These areas are primarily located along critical ecological corridors in the northwestern and northern parts of TGRA. Although these areas exhibit high ecological value, some face significant ecological challenges, with land use predominantly consisting of arable and forestland. The study recommends comprehensive improvements in arable land management, artificial afforestation, greening construction, and enhanced ecological environment monitoring to prevent the loss of ecological land. The findings not only provide scientific guidance for ecological restoration in TGRA but also offer new insights for ecological restoration research in other regions.
三峡库区生态修复重点区域的确定:系统与针对性视角
研究重点是在国土空间内精确识别生态修复优先级,以保障生态安全,加快实施差别化修复战略。通过整合系统生态保护和针对性修复的视角,构建了一个创新的“区域到点”框架,以准确确定国土空间生态修复工作的优先级。以三峡库区为例,采用生态系统服务重要性指数与生态问题指数相结合的双重评价方法,定量确定了三峡库区的修复“区域”。然后,从针对性修复的角度出发,运用生态安全格局构建方法识别修复“点”。最后,利用空间叠加技术确定不同干预水平的恢复优先级和策略。结果令人信服地证明了该框架的有效性和实用性。共确定了300.63 km2的生态恢复区域,划分为三级优先级:一级(75.69 km2)、二级(88.94 km2)和三级(136.00 km2)。这些区域主要位于青藏高原西北部和北部的关键生态廊道沿线。虽然这些地区具有很高的生态价值,但一些地区面临着严重的生态挑战,土地利用主要由耕地和林地组成。研究建议综合改进耕地管理,人工造林,绿化建设,加强生态环境监测,防止生态土地流失。研究结果不仅为青藏高原生态恢复提供了科学指导,也为其他地区的生态恢复研究提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信