Techno-Economic Comparison of Battery–Flywheel With Battery–Hydrogen Storage System in the Vicinity of Off-Grid HRES for Four Climates: MCDM Method

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Alireza Ahmadi, Ahmad Hajinezhad, Reza Fattahi, Seyed Farhan Moosavian
{"title":"Techno-Economic Comparison of Battery–Flywheel With Battery–Hydrogen Storage System in the Vicinity of Off-Grid HRES for Four Climates: MCDM Method","authors":"Alireza Ahmadi,&nbsp;Ahmad Hajinezhad,&nbsp;Reza Fattahi,&nbsp;Seyed Farhan Moosavian","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring sustainable power and heating in remote rural areas presents a considerable challenge. Renewable hybrid systems are typically recommended for this purpose; however, maintaining stability necessitates either a connection to the grid requiring electricity purchases from power plants, which are significant sources of pollution, or the deployment of extensive equipment to ensure system stability. This study examines four climatic regions in Iran, evaluating the selection between two storage systems, battery-hydrogen and battery–flywheel, through simulation and two-stage optimization. HOMER PRO software was utilized for both simulation and optimization, while the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) was employed for criteria weighting in decision-making, in conjunction with the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The findings indicate that the battery-hydrogen system is significantly more cost-effective, achieving savings of up to $211,327 in net present cost (NPC) and $0.738 in cost of energy (COE). Furthermore, the battery–hydrogen system demonstrates a greater reliance on renewable energy sources, increasing by up to 23.6% compared to the battery–flywheel system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"2512-2529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring sustainable power and heating in remote rural areas presents a considerable challenge. Renewable hybrid systems are typically recommended for this purpose; however, maintaining stability necessitates either a connection to the grid requiring electricity purchases from power plants, which are significant sources of pollution, or the deployment of extensive equipment to ensure system stability. This study examines four climatic regions in Iran, evaluating the selection between two storage systems, battery-hydrogen and battery–flywheel, through simulation and two-stage optimization. HOMER PRO software was utilized for both simulation and optimization, while the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) was employed for criteria weighting in decision-making, in conjunction with the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The findings indicate that the battery-hydrogen system is significantly more cost-effective, achieving savings of up to $211,327 in net present cost (NPC) and $0.738 in cost of energy (COE). Furthermore, the battery–hydrogen system demonstrates a greater reliance on renewable energy sources, increasing by up to 23.6% compared to the battery–flywheel system.

Abstract Image

四种气候条件下离网HRES附近电池-飞轮与电池-储氢系统的技术经济比较:MCDM方法
确保偏远农村地区的可持续电力和供暖是一个相当大的挑战。可再生混合系统通常推荐用于此目的;然而,要维持稳定,要么需要接入电网,从发电厂购买电力,而发电厂是重要的污染源,要么需要部署大量设备来确保系统稳定。本研究考察了伊朗的四个气候区,通过模拟和两阶段优化,评估了电池-氢和电池-飞轮两种存储系统之间的选择。采用HOMER PRO软件进行仿真和优化,决策中采用基于标准去除效果的方法(MEREC)进行标准加权,并结合理想解相似性偏好排序技术(TOPSIS)方法。研究结果表明,电池-氢系统具有更高的成本效益,可节省高达211,327美元的净现值成本(NPC)和0.738美元的能源成本(COE)。此外,与电池-飞轮系统相比,电池-氢系统对可再生能源的依赖程度更高,增加了23.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信