Performance Comparison Between Deep Learning Models for Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Time Series Data

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Nadeem Ahmed Tunio, Mohsin Ali Tunio, Muhammad Amir Raza, Muhammad Faheem, Ashfaque Ahmed Hashmani, Rumaisa Nadeem
{"title":"Performance Comparison Between Deep Learning Models for Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Time Series Data","authors":"Nadeem Ahmed Tunio,&nbsp;Mohsin Ali Tunio,&nbsp;Muhammad Amir Raza,&nbsp;Muhammad Faheem,&nbsp;Ashfaque Ahmed Hashmani,&nbsp;Rumaisa Nadeem","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep learning has become a vital tool for addressing complex challenges in power systems, particularly fault detection and classification in transmission lines. This study presents a comparative analysis of three advanced time-series models like temporal convolutional networks (TCN), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU) for fault classification. Leveraging a comprehensive data set encompassing diverse fault scenarios like single-phase to ground fault (AG), double line to ground fault (ABG), three-phase fault (ABC) from both simulated and real transmission line data, the study provides a rigorous evaluation of these models’ performance under realistic conditions. The results demonstrate that TCN achieves a fault classification accuracy of 99.9%, significantly outperforming BiLSTM (92.31%) and GRU (95.27%), while also excelling in precision, recall, <i>F</i>1 score, and training efficiency. Additionally, this study incorporates feature extraction techniques like discrete wavelet transform (CWT) to establish new benchmarks for fault classification. The findings underscore TCN's robustness in handling the dynamic nature of transmission line signals and its practical potential for real-time applications, contributing to the development of more reliable and efficient power system fault classification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"2330-2351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning has become a vital tool for addressing complex challenges in power systems, particularly fault detection and classification in transmission lines. This study presents a comparative analysis of three advanced time-series models like temporal convolutional networks (TCN), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU) for fault classification. Leveraging a comprehensive data set encompassing diverse fault scenarios like single-phase to ground fault (AG), double line to ground fault (ABG), three-phase fault (ABC) from both simulated and real transmission line data, the study provides a rigorous evaluation of these models’ performance under realistic conditions. The results demonstrate that TCN achieves a fault classification accuracy of 99.9%, significantly outperforming BiLSTM (92.31%) and GRU (95.27%), while also excelling in precision, recall, F1 score, and training efficiency. Additionally, this study incorporates feature extraction techniques like discrete wavelet transform (CWT) to establish new benchmarks for fault classification. The findings underscore TCN's robustness in handling the dynamic nature of transmission line signals and its practical potential for real-time applications, contributing to the development of more reliable and efficient power system fault classification systems.

Abstract Image

基于时间序列数据的输电线路故障分类深度学习模型性能比较
深度学习已经成为解决电力系统复杂挑战的重要工具,特别是输电线路的故障检测和分类。本研究比较分析了三种先进的时间序列模型,即时间卷积网络(TCN)、双向长短期记忆(BiLSTM)和门控循环单元(GRU)用于故障分类。利用综合数据集,包括各种故障场景,如单相接地故障(AG)、双线接地故障(ABG)、三相故障(ABC),从模拟和真实的输电线路数据,该研究提供了严格的评估这些模型在现实条件下的性能。结果表明,TCN的故障分类准确率达到99.9%,显著优于BiLSTM(92.31%)和GRU(95.27%),同时在准确率、查全率、F1分数和训练效率方面也表现优异。此外,本研究还结合了离散小波变换(CWT)等特征提取技术,为故障分类建立了新的基准。这些发现强调了TCN在处理传输线信号的动态特性方面的稳健性及其实时应用的实际潜力,有助于开发更可靠和有效的电力系统故障分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信