Redefining residential mobility: The impact pathways of residential mobility experiences and expectations on subjective well-being

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Su-qing Meng, Bao-yu Bai, Nian Zhong
{"title":"Redefining residential mobility: The impact pathways of residential mobility experiences and expectations on subjective well-being","authors":"Su-qing Meng,&nbsp;Bao-yu Bai,&nbsp;Nian Zhong","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Residential mobility is a critical socio-ecological factor involving substantial changes in both physical and social environments. However, existing research has inconsistently defined and measured residential mobility, creating ambiguity about whether past experiences or future expectations primarily drive its psychological impact. This study addresses this gap by examining both the distinctions and connections between residential mobility experiences and expectations, with the goal of identifying the primary mechanism influencing subjective well-being. Guided by pragmatic prospection theory and sensitised-specialisation theory, we conducted two studies. In Study 1, a manipulation experiment revealed that residential mobility expectations had a stronger impact on subjective well-being than residential mobility experiences. In Study 2, a large-scale survey demonstrated that residential mobility expectations mediate the relationship between residential mobility experiences and subjective well-being. Together, these findings highlight the distinct yet interconnected roles of residential mobility experiences and expectations. While residential mobility experiences provide a foundational context, it is the expectations of future mobility that predominantly shape the psychological impact on well-being. These results underscore residential mobility expectations as the primary mechanism by which residential mobility influences individual outcomes, offering valuable theoretical and practical insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential mobility is a critical socio-ecological factor involving substantial changes in both physical and social environments. However, existing research has inconsistently defined and measured residential mobility, creating ambiguity about whether past experiences or future expectations primarily drive its psychological impact. This study addresses this gap by examining both the distinctions and connections between residential mobility experiences and expectations, with the goal of identifying the primary mechanism influencing subjective well-being. Guided by pragmatic prospection theory and sensitised-specialisation theory, we conducted two studies. In Study 1, a manipulation experiment revealed that residential mobility expectations had a stronger impact on subjective well-being than residential mobility experiences. In Study 2, a large-scale survey demonstrated that residential mobility expectations mediate the relationship between residential mobility experiences and subjective well-being. Together, these findings highlight the distinct yet interconnected roles of residential mobility experiences and expectations. While residential mobility experiences provide a foundational context, it is the expectations of future mobility that predominantly shape the psychological impact on well-being. These results underscore residential mobility expectations as the primary mechanism by which residential mobility influences individual outcomes, offering valuable theoretical and practical insights.

重新定义居住流动:居住流动体验和期望对主观幸福感的影响途径
居民流动是一个重要的社会生态因素,涉及物理和社会环境的重大变化。然而,现有的研究对居住流动性的定义和衡量并不一致,这使得过去的经历还是未来的预期主要推动了其心理影响的模糊性。本研究通过考察居住流动体验和期望之间的区别和联系来解决这一差距,目的是确定影响主观幸福感的主要机制。在语用展望理论和敏感专业化理论的指导下,我们进行了两项研究。研究1通过操纵实验发现,居住流动性预期对主观幸福感的影响强于居住流动性体验。在研究2中,一项大规模的调查表明,居住流动性预期在居住流动性体验与主观幸福感之间起到中介作用。综上所述,这些发现突出了住宅流动性体验和期望的不同但相互关联的作用。虽然住宅流动性体验提供了一个基础背景,但对未来流动性的预期主要影响着幸福感的心理影响。这些结果强调了居住流动性预期是居住流动性影响个体结果的主要机制,提供了有价值的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信