Association Between Retinopathy and Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Alireza Fatemi, Aylin Taghipour, Yasmin Yazdooei, Mahdis Fatemi, Akram Hashemi, Nafiseh Abdolahi
{"title":"Association Between Retinopathy and Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Alireza Fatemi,&nbsp;Aylin Taghipour,&nbsp;Yasmin Yazdooei,&nbsp;Mahdis Fatemi,&nbsp;Akram Hashemi,&nbsp;Nafiseh Abdolahi","doi":"10.1111/1756-185X.70253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Studies have indicated a potential link between retinopathy and systemic sclerosis (SSc), but the precise nature of this association remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the relationship between SSc and retinopathy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search was conducted across four major databases and gray literature to collect all relevant studies. The quality of the selected articles was assessed for risk of bias using standardized tools.</p>\n \n <p>A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference (Std. Mean Difference) to estimate the association between retinopathy and SSc. Additional analyses for heterogeneity, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias were also conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve studies (359 cases, 314 controls) were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of eight studies found a nonsignificant and negligible association (pooled Std. Mean Difference = 0.08; 95% CI = −0.31 to 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.67) between SSc and retinopathy, with no publication bias (<i>p</i> = 0.5362). Differences in Std. Mean Difference were observed in subgroup analyses but did not sufficiently explain the heterogeneity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest no strong association between retinopathy and SSc. While some subgroup analyses revealed potential variations, they did not fully clarify the observed heterogeneity. Further research with larger, well-designed studies is necessary to determine whether retinopathy could serve as a biomarker for SSc.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Systematic Review Registration Number (PROSPERO)</h3>\n \n <p>CRD42024529644 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=529644.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.70253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Studies have indicated a potential link between retinopathy and systemic sclerosis (SSc), but the precise nature of this association remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the relationship between SSc and retinopathy.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across four major databases and gray literature to collect all relevant studies. The quality of the selected articles was assessed for risk of bias using standardized tools.

A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference (Std. Mean Difference) to estimate the association between retinopathy and SSc. Additional analyses for heterogeneity, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias were also conducted.

Results

Twelve studies (359 cases, 314 controls) were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of eight studies found a nonsignificant and negligible association (pooled Std. Mean Difference = 0.08; 95% CI = −0.31 to 0.48; p = 0.67) between SSc and retinopathy, with no publication bias (p = 0.5362). Differences in Std. Mean Difference were observed in subgroup analyses but did not sufficiently explain the heterogeneity.

Conclusions

The findings suggest no strong association between retinopathy and SSc. While some subgroup analyses revealed potential variations, they did not fully clarify the observed heterogeneity. Further research with larger, well-designed studies is necessary to determine whether retinopathy could serve as a biomarker for SSc.

Systematic Review Registration Number (PROSPERO)

CRD42024529644 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=529644.

视网膜病变和系统性硬化症之间的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
研究表明视网膜病变和系统性硬化症(SSc)之间存在潜在联系,但这种联系的确切性质尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合现有证据来评估SSc与视网膜病变之间的关系。方法系统检索四个主要数据库和灰色文献,收集所有相关研究。使用标准化工具评估入选文章的偏倚风险。采用标准化平均差异(Std. mean difference)进行meta分析,以估计视网膜病变与SSc之间的关联。对异质性、敏感性、亚组和发表偏倚也进行了分析。结果12项研究(359例,314例对照)纳入系统评价。对8项研究的荟萃分析发现,两者之间的关联不显著且可以忽略不计(合并Std. Mean Difference = 0.08;95% CI = - 0.31 ~ 0.48;p = 0.67),无发表偏倚(p = 0.5362)。在亚组分析中观察到Std和Mean的差异,但不能充分解释异质性。结论视网膜病变与SSc无明显相关性。虽然一些亚组分析揭示了潜在的变化,但它们并没有完全澄清观察到的异质性。为了确定视网膜病变是否可以作为SSc的生物标志物,有必要进行更大规模、设计良好的进一步研究。系统评价注册号(PROSPERO) CRD42024529644 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=529644。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信