{"title":"Correction to EuPPollNet: A European Database of Plant–Pollinator Networks","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/geb.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lanuza, J. B., Knight, T. M., Montes-Perez, N., Glenny, W., Acuña, P., Albrecht, M., … & Bartomeus, I. (2025). EuPPollNet: A European Database of Plant-Pollinator Networks. <i>Global Ecology and Biogeography</i>, <i>34</i>(2), e70000.</p><p>In the originally published article, an error in the code resulted in duplicated interactions per study. After correcting this issue, the authors have updated several numerical values reported in the main text. The updated text is shown below. The authors have also updated the link to the dataset on Zenodo to reflect the new version.</p><p>Additionally, one of the figures used was incorrect. The correct figured is included below.</p><p>\n <b>Abstract:</b>\n </p><p><b>Main Types of Variables Included:</b> EuPPollNet contains 623,476 interactions between plants and pollinators from 1864distinct networks, which belong to 52 different studies distributed across 23 European countries. Information about sampling methodology, habitat type, biogeographic region and additional taxonomic rank information (i.e. order, family, genus and species) is also provided.</p><p><b>Major Taxa and Level of Measurement:</b> The database contains interaction data at the species level for 91% of the records, including a total of 1411 plant and 2223 pollinator species. The database includes data on 6% of the European species of floweringplants, 34% of bees, 26% of butterflies and 33% of syrphid species at the European level.</p><p><b>Software Format:</b> The database was built with R and is stored in ‘.rds’ and ‘.csv’ formats. Its construction is fully reproducibleand can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15183272.</p><p>\n <b>2 | Methods</b>\n </p><p>\n <b>2.2 | Dataset Description</b>\n </p><p>All the studies documented interactions with Hymenopterans (with 51% considering all Hymenopterans, 44% only wild bees and 3% only bumblebees), 92% documented interactions with Dipterans (with 46% considering all Dipterans, 44% only syrphids and 5% recorded syrphids plus bombylids or tachinid flies), 64% with Lepidopterans, and 33% with Coleopterans. The database includes a total of 623,476 distinct interactions.</p><p>However, the majority of plant-pollinator interactions are from Hymenoptera species (90%; Figure 1c). Notably, the western honey bee, Apis mellifera, represents 69% of the total interaction records from the database and an average of 30% of the total interactions per network.</p><p>\n <b>3 | Results</b>\n </p><p>Bees (i.e., Anthophila) constitute 86% of the interactions in EuPPollNet, and 75% of the interactions when excluding honey bees.</p><p>\n <b>4 | Discussion</b>\n </p><p>The database contains 1411 plant and 2223 pollinator species with over half a million interaction records.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lanuza, J. B., Knight, T. M., Montes-Perez, N., Glenny, W., Acuña, P., Albrecht, M., … & Bartomeus, I. (2025). EuPPollNet: A European Database of Plant-Pollinator Networks. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 34(2), e70000.
In the originally published article, an error in the code resulted in duplicated interactions per study. After correcting this issue, the authors have updated several numerical values reported in the main text. The updated text is shown below. The authors have also updated the link to the dataset on Zenodo to reflect the new version.
Additionally, one of the figures used was incorrect. The correct figured is included below.
Abstract:
Main Types of Variables Included: EuPPollNet contains 623,476 interactions between plants and pollinators from 1864distinct networks, which belong to 52 different studies distributed across 23 European countries. Information about sampling methodology, habitat type, biogeographic region and additional taxonomic rank information (i.e. order, family, genus and species) is also provided.
Major Taxa and Level of Measurement: The database contains interaction data at the species level for 91% of the records, including a total of 1411 plant and 2223 pollinator species. The database includes data on 6% of the European species of floweringplants, 34% of bees, 26% of butterflies and 33% of syrphid species at the European level.
Software Format: The database was built with R and is stored in ‘.rds’ and ‘.csv’ formats. Its construction is fully reproducibleand can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15183272.
2 | Methods
2.2 | Dataset Description
All the studies documented interactions with Hymenopterans (with 51% considering all Hymenopterans, 44% only wild bees and 3% only bumblebees), 92% documented interactions with Dipterans (with 46% considering all Dipterans, 44% only syrphids and 5% recorded syrphids plus bombylids or tachinid flies), 64% with Lepidopterans, and 33% with Coleopterans. The database includes a total of 623,476 distinct interactions.
However, the majority of plant-pollinator interactions are from Hymenoptera species (90%; Figure 1c). Notably, the western honey bee, Apis mellifera, represents 69% of the total interaction records from the database and an average of 30% of the total interactions per network.
3 | Results
Bees (i.e., Anthophila) constitute 86% of the interactions in EuPPollNet, and 75% of the interactions when excluding honey bees.
4 | Discussion
The database contains 1411 plant and 2223 pollinator species with over half a million interaction records.
Lanuza, J. B., Knight, T. M., Montes-Perez, N., Glenny, W., Acuña, P., Albrecht, M.,…&;Bartomeus, I.(2025)。EuPPollNet:欧洲植物传粉者网络数据库。全球生态与生物地理,34(2),e70000。在最初发表的文章中,代码中的一个错误导致了每个研究的重复交互。修正此问题后,作者更新了正文中报告的几个数值。更新后的文本如下所示。作者还更新了到Zenodo上数据集的链接,以反映新版本。此外,其中一个数字是不正确的。正确的数字如下。EuPPollNet包含了来自1864个不同网络的623,476种植物与传粉者之间的相互作用,这些网络属于分布在23个欧洲国家的52个不同研究。还提供了有关采样方法、生境类型、生物地理区域和其他分类等级信息(即目、科、属和种)的信息。主要分类群和测量水平:该数据库包含91%的记录在物种水平上的相互作用数据,包括1411种植物和2223种传粉媒介。该数据库包括欧洲6%的开花植物物种、34%的蜜蜂、26%的蝴蝶和33%的梅毒物种的数据。软件格式:数据库是用R语言构建的,存储在。Rds ‘和’ .csv '格式。它的结构是完全可复制的,可以访问https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15183272。所有的研究都记录了与膜翅目昆虫的相互作用(51%的研究涉及所有膜翅目昆虫,44%的研究涉及野蜂,3%的研究涉及大黄蜂),92%的研究记录了与双翅目昆虫的相互作用(46%的研究涉及所有双翅目昆虫,44%的研究涉及蚜蝇,5%的研究记录了蚜蝇加家蝇或绢蝇),64%的研究记录了与鳞翅目昆虫的相互作用,33%的研究记录了与鞘翅目昆虫的相互作用。该数据库总共包含623,476个不同的交互。然而,大多数植物与传粉者的相互作用来自膜翅目物种(90%;图1 c)。值得注意的是,西部蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)占数据库中总交互记录的69%,平均占每个网络总交互记录的30%。结果在EuPPollNet中,蜜蜂(即Anthophila)占相互作用的86%,在排除蜜蜂的情况下,占相互作用的75%。该数据库包含1411种植物和2223种传粉者,有超过50万条相互作用记录。我们为这些错误道歉。
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.