Energy and Exergy Efficiency Analysis of an Ejector-Expansion Refrigeration Cycle Using the Working Fluid R134a and Its Potential Substitutes

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaoqin Liu, Weibin Wang, Jianyong Wang
{"title":"Energy and Exergy Efficiency Analysis of an Ejector-Expansion Refrigeration Cycle Using the Working Fluid R134a and Its Potential Substitutes","authors":"Xiaoqin Liu,&nbsp;Weibin Wang,&nbsp;Jianyong Wang","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper proposes an ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle (EERC) with two evaporating temperatures to recover partial expansion work and greatly reduces the throttling loss of the other expansion valve connected to the evaporator compared with the conventional bievaporator refrigeration cycle (CBEC). Furthermore, R134a will be phased out due to its high global warming potential, while the mixture refrigerants of R1234yf, R1234ze, and R152a were considered as potential alternatives. The energy and exergy analysis methods are used to evaluate and compare the performance of two cycles and seven kinds of different refrigerants. Results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency of EERC are 17.1% and 16.4% higher than those of CBEC, and the total exergy loss can be reduced by 26.1% under given operating conditions. The drop-in analysis is carried out for equal operating conditions, and the EERC performances of mixtures are analyzed. The mixture refrigerants of R1234yf R152a/R1234yf/R1234ze (mass fraction of 0.4/0.3/0.3) and R134a/R1234yf (mass fraction of 0.9/0.1) appear to be a good candidate for drop-in replacement of R134a due to similar COP, volumetric cooling capacity, and exergy efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"2389-2400"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes an ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle (EERC) with two evaporating temperatures to recover partial expansion work and greatly reduces the throttling loss of the other expansion valve connected to the evaporator compared with the conventional bievaporator refrigeration cycle (CBEC). Furthermore, R134a will be phased out due to its high global warming potential, while the mixture refrigerants of R1234yf, R1234ze, and R152a were considered as potential alternatives. The energy and exergy analysis methods are used to evaluate and compare the performance of two cycles and seven kinds of different refrigerants. Results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency of EERC are 17.1% and 16.4% higher than those of CBEC, and the total exergy loss can be reduced by 26.1% under given operating conditions. The drop-in analysis is carried out for equal operating conditions, and the EERC performances of mixtures are analyzed. The mixture refrigerants of R1234yf R152a/R1234yf/R1234ze (mass fraction of 0.4/0.3/0.3) and R134a/R1234yf (mass fraction of 0.9/0.1) appear to be a good candidate for drop-in replacement of R134a due to similar COP, volumetric cooling capacity, and exergy efficiency.

Abstract Image

使用工质R134a及其潜在替代品的喷射器-膨胀式制冷循环的能量和火用效率分析
本文提出了一种具有两个蒸发温度的喷射器-膨胀制冷循环(EERC),与传统的双蒸发器制冷循环(CBEC)相比,该循环可以回收部分膨胀功,并大大减少与蒸发器相连的另一个膨胀阀的节流损失。此外,由于R134a具有较高的全球变暖潜势,将被逐步淘汰,而R1234yf、R1234ze和R152a的混合制冷剂被认为是潜在的替代品。采用能量和火用分析方法对两个循环和7种不同制冷剂的性能进行了评价和比较。结果表明,在相同工况下,EERC的性能系数(COP)和火用效率分别比CBEC高17.1%和16.4%,总火用损失可降低26.1%。在等工况下进行了滴入分析,分析了混合料的EERC性能。R1234yf、R152a/R1234yf/R1234ze(质量分数为0.4/0.3/0.3)和R134a/R1234yf(质量分数为0.9/0.1)的混合制冷剂具有相似的COP、容积制冷量和火用效率,是替代R134a的较好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信