{"title":"Mandated Board Gender Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence From the European “Women on Boards” Directive","authors":"Carlos Fernández-Méndez, Shams Pathan","doi":"10.1002/csr.3147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Using the 2022 European Union (EU) “women on boards” directive as a backdrop, we examine its wealth impact on firms in reference to their sustainability scores. Our analysis shows that investors respond positively to the EU gender quota, with a stronger effect on firms with low ESG scores. Particularly, we find that the abnormal returns on the announcement day are 0.5% higher on average for firms with weaker ESG performance, suggesting they have more to gain from the EU quota regulation. Our results reveal also that investors' expectations about the impact of the EU gender quota on ESG performance and firm value vary with differences in the institutional context across European countries. We observe more positive response in countries with strong regulatory environment characterized by high regulatory quality and strong legal enforcement and also in countries aligned with gender equality and sustainability values.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 3","pages":"3602-3620"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.3147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using the 2022 European Union (EU) “women on boards” directive as a backdrop, we examine its wealth impact on firms in reference to their sustainability scores. Our analysis shows that investors respond positively to the EU gender quota, with a stronger effect on firms with low ESG scores. Particularly, we find that the abnormal returns on the announcement day are 0.5% higher on average for firms with weaker ESG performance, suggesting they have more to gain from the EU quota regulation. Our results reveal also that investors' expectations about the impact of the EU gender quota on ESG performance and firm value vary with differences in the institutional context across European countries. We observe more positive response in countries with strong regulatory environment characterized by high regulatory quality and strong legal enforcement and also in countries aligned with gender equality and sustainability values.
期刊介绍:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.