Insights From Observations and Large-Scale Field Experiments on Vole Population Cycles in Northern Europe: A 40-Year Study of Predator–Prey Interactions

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Erkki Korpimäki, Peter B. Banks, Tero Klemola
{"title":"Insights From Observations and Large-Scale Field Experiments on Vole Population Cycles in Northern Europe: A 40-Year Study of Predator–Prey Interactions","authors":"Erkki Korpimäki,&nbsp;Peter B. Banks,&nbsp;Tero Klemola","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mechanisms driving 3–5-year population cycles of voles involve delayed density-dependent feedback on vole populations. The key drivers of this feedback include prolonged periods of food depletion or predation mortality over more than one phase of the cycle. We review observational and experimental data gathered between the 1970s and 2010s on vole population fluctuations and the responses of their avian and mammalian predators in west-central Finland, focusing on studies that have investigated these drivers. Least weasels and stoats were the main predators of voles, causing 77% of all kills, while 22% were killed by avian predators. The numbers of least weasels tracked vole densities with a 9–12-month lag, which resulted in delayed density-dependent kill rates of voles in winter. Experimental reduction of small mustelids and avian predators in unfenced areas (each 2.5–3 km<sup>2</sup>) prevented the cyclic decline of vole densities in the subsequent summer, whereas in areas with only least weasel reduction and in control areas, a decline in vole densities occurred. In another field experiment, the reduction of both mustelid and avian predator densities increased the autumn density of <i>Microtus</i> voles fourfold during the low phase of the cycle, accelerated the increase twofold, increased the autumn density of voles twofold in the peak phase, and delayed the initiation of decline. Our unique experimental results suggest that the collective impact of both mustelid and avian predators is a likely mechanistic explanation for high-amplitude population cycles of voles in North Europe. In these highly seasonal environments with short summers, a shortage of high-quality winter food may be the directly density-dependent factor stopping the growth of vole populations. This allows predators to catch up with prey densities and impose population decline and prolong the low phase of the cycle in a delayed density-dependent manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71419","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanisms driving 3–5-year population cycles of voles involve delayed density-dependent feedback on vole populations. The key drivers of this feedback include prolonged periods of food depletion or predation mortality over more than one phase of the cycle. We review observational and experimental data gathered between the 1970s and 2010s on vole population fluctuations and the responses of their avian and mammalian predators in west-central Finland, focusing on studies that have investigated these drivers. Least weasels and stoats were the main predators of voles, causing 77% of all kills, while 22% were killed by avian predators. The numbers of least weasels tracked vole densities with a 9–12-month lag, which resulted in delayed density-dependent kill rates of voles in winter. Experimental reduction of small mustelids and avian predators in unfenced areas (each 2.5–3 km2) prevented the cyclic decline of vole densities in the subsequent summer, whereas in areas with only least weasel reduction and in control areas, a decline in vole densities occurred. In another field experiment, the reduction of both mustelid and avian predator densities increased the autumn density of Microtus voles fourfold during the low phase of the cycle, accelerated the increase twofold, increased the autumn density of voles twofold in the peak phase, and delayed the initiation of decline. Our unique experimental results suggest that the collective impact of both mustelid and avian predators is a likely mechanistic explanation for high-amplitude population cycles of voles in North Europe. In these highly seasonal environments with short summers, a shortage of high-quality winter food may be the directly density-dependent factor stopping the growth of vole populations. This allows predators to catch up with prey densities and impose population decline and prolong the low phase of the cycle in a delayed density-dependent manner.

Abstract Image

来自北欧田鼠种群周期的观察和大规模野外实验的见解:捕食者-猎物相互作用的40年研究
田鼠种群3 - 5年种群周期的驱动机制涉及对田鼠种群的延迟密度依赖反馈。这种反馈的主要驱动因素包括在周期的一个以上阶段中食物消耗或被捕食者死亡的时间延长。我们回顾了20世纪70年代至2010年代在芬兰中西部收集的关于田鼠种群波动及其鸟类和哺乳动物捕食者反应的观察和实验数据,重点研究了这些驱动因素。黄鼠狼和白鼬是田鼠的主要捕食者,占总捕杀量的77%,而鸟类捕食者则占22%。最小鼬鼠的数量追踪田鼠密度有9 - 12个月的滞后,这导致冬季田鼠的密度依赖性杀鼠率延迟。在无围栏地区(每2.5-3 km2)实验性减少小型鼬鼠和鸟类捕食者,可防止随后夏季田鼠密度的循环下降,而在黄鼠狼减少最少的地区和控制区,田鼠密度出现下降。在另一项野外实验中,鼬鼠和鸟类捕食者密度的降低使田鼠秋季密度在周期的低谷期增加了4倍,增加速度加快了2倍,在周期的高峰期增加了2倍,并且推迟了下降的开始。我们独特的实验结果表明,鼬鼠和鸟类捕食者的集体影响可能是北欧田鼠高振幅种群周期的机制解释。在这些夏季短暂的高度季节性环境中,缺乏高质量的冬季食物可能是阻止田鼠种群增长的直接密度依赖因素。这使得捕食者能够赶上猎物的密度,施加种群数量的下降,并以一种延迟的密度依赖方式延长周期的低阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信