Wound Management Amongst Doctors in Training: A Cross-Sectional Study of Education and Capability

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Hamza Duffaydar, Octavi Casals-Farre, Jessica Morgan, Harri Jones, Hassan Duffaydar, Amy Smith, Charles Kimberly, James Brock, Rhidian Morgan-Jones, Arwel Poacher
{"title":"Wound Management Amongst Doctors in Training: A Cross-Sectional Study of Education and Capability","authors":"Hamza Duffaydar,&nbsp;Octavi Casals-Farre,&nbsp;Jessica Morgan,&nbsp;Harri Jones,&nbsp;Hassan Duffaydar,&nbsp;Amy Smith,&nbsp;Charles Kimberly,&nbsp;James Brock,&nbsp;Rhidian Morgan-Jones,&nbsp;Arwel Poacher","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wound care in the UK is a resource-intensive challenge, costing the NHS £8.3 billion annually and growing with an ageing population. However, there is no evidence of whether doctors in training receive adequate teaching to perform wound care competently. Our study aimed to investigate doctors’ confidence when assessing and managing wounds and their preferred learning modality. This cross-sectional study comprised 262 doctors training across the UK. We assessed the correlation between confidence in managing wounds, seniority in training, and trainee speciality. Only 65% of doctors had received teaching on wound healing during medical school, and 25% received further teaching during postgraduate training. Surgical trainees felt more confident in assessing and managing wounds than their medical counterparts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and surgeons were the only group demonstrating a positive correlation between seniority and confidence in wound management (<i>p</i> = 0.02). All speciality groups favoured bedside teaching and thought wound management was integral to clinical practice. Our study has shown that training is sub optimally delivered and insufficient for trainee requirements. Incorporating dedicated teaching across specialities will be essential to manage the increasing demand for wound care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70674","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70674","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wound care in the UK is a resource-intensive challenge, costing the NHS £8.3 billion annually and growing with an ageing population. However, there is no evidence of whether doctors in training receive adequate teaching to perform wound care competently. Our study aimed to investigate doctors’ confidence when assessing and managing wounds and their preferred learning modality. This cross-sectional study comprised 262 doctors training across the UK. We assessed the correlation between confidence in managing wounds, seniority in training, and trainee speciality. Only 65% of doctors had received teaching on wound healing during medical school, and 25% received further teaching during postgraduate training. Surgical trainees felt more confident in assessing and managing wounds than their medical counterparts (p < 0.01), and surgeons were the only group demonstrating a positive correlation between seniority and confidence in wound management (p = 0.02). All speciality groups favoured bedside teaching and thought wound management was integral to clinical practice. Our study has shown that training is sub optimally delivered and insufficient for trainee requirements. Incorporating dedicated teaching across specialities will be essential to manage the increasing demand for wound care.

Abstract Image

培训医生的伤口管理:教育和能力的横断面研究
在英国,伤口护理是一项资源密集型的挑战,每年要花费NHS 83亿英镑,并且随着人口老龄化而增加。然而,没有证据表明接受培训的医生是否接受了足够的教学来胜任伤口护理。我们的研究旨在调查医生在评估和处理伤口时的信心以及他们首选的学习方式。这项横断面研究包括262名在英国接受培训的医生。我们评估了伤口处理信心、培训年资和受训者专业之间的相关性。只有65%的医生在医学院接受过伤口愈合的教学,25%的医生在研究生培训期间接受过进一步的教学。外科培训生在评估和处理伤口方面比他们的医疗同行更有信心(p < 0.01),外科医生是唯一显示资历与伤口处理信心呈正相关的群体(p = 0.02)。各专科组均支持床边教学,认为伤口管理是临床实践不可或缺的一部分。我们的研究表明,培训不是最优的,不能满足学员的需求。整合跨专业的专门教学对于管理日益增长的伤口护理需求至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信